• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Right Recruitment Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

52 Southbury Road, Enfield, EN1 1YB (020) 8292 0980

Provided and run by:
Right Recruitment Ltd

Assessment report published 17 January 2026

On this page

Effective

Good

15 January 2026

Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Assessing needs

Score: 3

The provider made sure people’s care and treatment was effective by assessing and reviewing their health, care, wellbeing and communication needs with them.

Examples of people’s care plans were shared with us. People’s care needs were assessed and regularly reviewed. Care plans provided good detail for staff to follow. Everyone we spoke with told us they were happy with the care and support being provided by the service. Documents reviewed contained examples of good practice guidance. This meant people could be assured that their care and support was being delivered by a team with a clear understanding of their needs. The registered manager said, “I would do the assessment in the hospital or at their home, to find out if we can meet their needs, look at the environment, GP, medicines, their needs I would ask people what they need, I would usually have a member of staff with me. There would be family or the social worker present.”

Delivering evidence-based care and treatment

Score: 3

The provider planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. They did this in line with legislation and current evidence-based good practice and standards.

Information in people’s care plans was clear and gave guidance to staff as and when required. For example, information on healthy diets was available if this was needed. Recommendations made by health care professionals were followed by staff. These recommendations were clearly documented in care plans which followed national guidance. People told us staff knew them well and provided good care.

How staff, teams and services work together

Score: 3

The provider worked well across teams and services to support people. They made sure people only needed to tell their story once by sharing their assessment of needs when people moved between different services.

Records viewed showed the service were working in partnership with professionals such as GPs and district nurses. Communication was timely and effective. A relative said, “Staff would accompany my relative to the hospital or the GP and share the information with me.”

Supporting people to live healthier lives

Score: 3

The provider supported people to manage their health and wellbeing to maximise their independence, choice and control. Staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support.

The care plans we reviewed showed evidence of clear achievable outcomes for people. Care workers promoted a healthy lifestyle and had guidance from healthcare professionals. Examples shared with us showed people had become healthier because of the care being provided. For example, a person’s nutritional needs improved as staff were encouraging and supporting the person daily. A relative said, “Carers sit with my relative and assist them to eat. This has helped a lot.”

Monitoring and improving outcomes

Score: 3

The provider routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured that outcomes were positive and consistent, and that they met both clinical expectations and the expectations of people themselves.

Outcomes were documented and actions were clear on how they could be achieved. Care workers had guidance to ensure they could support people with their goals. People’s care and support was regularly reviewed, and changes were communicated to the care team. People and relatives told us they felt all care needs were met by the team. A relatives said, “I have access to the care plan but haven’t looked at it. I would contact the manager and make changes if required.”

The provider told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment.

Relatives told us their relative was respected by the care workers and consent was obtained before providing care and support. Care workers had a good understanding of consent. A care worker said, “My role as a care worker is to carry out daily assessments to determine whether the client lacks capacity during conversations. Then report to the manager.”

Information, shared by the provider showed that people had been consulted with and consent obtained. The provider followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.