Updated 4 March 2023
The inspection
We carried out this performance review and assessment under Section 46 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act). We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements of the regulations associated with the Act and looked at the quality of the service to provide a rating.
Unlike our standard approach to assessing performance, we did not physically visit the office of the location. This is a new approach we have introduced to reviewing and assessing performance of some care at home providers. Instead of visiting the office location we use technology such as electronic file sharing and video or phone calls to engage with people using the service and staff.
Inspection team
An inspector and 1 Expert by Experience carried out this performance review and assessment. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
Registered Manager
This service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because the service provides care to people living in their own homes and we needed to make arrangements to contact them.
Inspection activity started on 21 December 2022 and ended on 10 February 2023.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since they registered with us. We sought feedback from the local authority and health commissioners who work with the service. We used all this information to plan our inspection. The provider was not asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR) prior to this inspection. A PIR is information providers send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
During the inspection
This performance review and assessment was carried out without a visit to the location’s office. We used telephone calls to enable us to engage with people using the service and relatives, and electronic file sharing to enable us to review documentation. We contacted staff via email. We received feedback from 5 people, 8 relatives and 11 staff.