• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Bakers' Villas

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Mill House, 23 Bakers Lane, Epping, Essex, CM16 5DQ (01992) 575951

Provided and run by:
The Baker's Benevolent Society

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 3 March 2026 to 16 March 2026

Bakers’ Villas provides an extra care housing service where people live independently in their own flats and receive personal care tailored to their individual needs. At the time of our inspection 10 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care, which included support with personal hygiene and eating. Where applicable, we also considered the broader social care provided.

This was a responsive inspection based on the length of time since the last assessment.

Throughout the visit, people consistently reported feeling safe, well supported, and treated with dignity and respect. They described staff as “kind”,“caring”,“excellent”, and “like family”. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s health needs, routines, histories and communication preferences, and used this knowledge to deliver person-centred and compassionate care.

The service benefited from a stable, long standing registered manager and staffing team. Both the Registered Manager and Care Manager were visible,approachable and highly regarded by people and staff. Staff felt valued, confident to speak up and well supported in their roles. Daily handovers, close teamwork and flexible rotas helped maintain continuity and responsiveness.

People received support that was effective and adapted to changing needs. Staff worked collaboratively with GPs, district nurses, pharmacies, therapists, palliative care teams and other professionals. Care plans reviewed during the visit contained meaningful detail about risks, routines, equipment, mobility needs and health conditions. People reported receiving their medicines on time and being supported appropriately with nutrition, hydration and personal care.

The culture of the service was warm,inclusive and responsive. Activities such as bingo, crafts, clubs, social gatherings and seasonal events helped reduce isolation and promoted wellbeing. Staff supported people to make choices, maintain independence where possible, and participate in daily life in ways that mattered to them. People said they felt listened to and knew how to raise concerns. Complaints had been recorded and managed appropriately.

There were, however, some areas requiring improvement, these included gaps in supervision frequency, incomplete verification of some recruitment documents, and where a gap in employment had not been fully explored. We also noted that incidents and accidents were not always reported to the local authority or to CQC as required. The registered manager was receptive to the feedback and guidance provided and took immediate action; both incidents we identified were retrospectively referred to the local authority safeguarding team, and the appropriate notifications were submitted to CQC.

Despite these governance weaknesses, the overall quality of peoples’day-to-day experience remained extremely positive. People felt safe, respected and well supported, and staff presented as dedicated, compassionate and committed to achieving good outcomes. Continued focus on improving documentation, audit processes, and notification practices will support the service to maintain and build upon the positive care culture already in place.

 

14 March 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: This service provides care and support to seven people living in a supported living’ setting so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate the premises used for supported living. This inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

People’s experience of using this service:

¿ People were supported by consistent staff they felt safe with and who knew them well.

¿ Staff turned up on time and gave a good quality of care to people, in a way they wanted.

¿ People received their medicines at the right time and in the right way.

¿ Staff were well trained and supported by the registered manager, who they held in high regard.

¿ People were supported to maintain a diet that met their nutritional needs.

¿ People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

¿ Detailed assessments were in place, and people’s care records were detailed and written in an enabling way.

¿ People told us they were supported by exceptionally kind staff that knew their needs and preferences in detail.

¿ The registered manager and staff looked at ways in which people communicated and had considered how they could support people to express themselves in a way which was tailored to them.

¿ People were given information about how to complain when they moved in, and felt fully confident to raise any concerns that they may have had.

¿ Audit systems were in place which identified areas for improvement. Regular meetings were held with staff and people, and these were used to look at any areas that may need to be improved.

This service met the characteristics of Good in all areas; For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Rating at last inspection: This service was last rated Good. (2 August 2016)

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor the service through the information we receive, and inspect the service, if risk is indicated.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

2 August 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place 02 August 2016 and was announced.

The inspection was carried out by one inspector.

Bakers' Villas is a domiciliary care service that is registered to provide personal care. The service is provided to people living in sheltered accommodation owned by the Bakers Benevolent Society. People can be supported by 'in-house' care workers employed by the service. This domiciliary care service enables people to continue living independently in their own flat or bungalow within the complex. At the time of the inspection 6 people were using the service.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt safe. Staff had received training to enable them to recognise signs and symptoms of abuse and knew how to report them, protecting people from avoidable harm and abuse.

People had risk assessments in place to enable them to be as independent as they could be whilst being kept safe.

There were sufficient staff, with the correct skill mix, on duty to support people with their needs.

Effective recruitment processes were in place and followed by the service to ensure staff employed were suitable for the role.

Medicines were managed safely. The processes in place ensured that the administration and handling of medicines was suitable for the people who used the service. Some people administered their own medication.

Staff received a comprehensive induction process and on-going training. They were well supported by the registered manager and had regular one to one time for supervisions and annual appraisals.

Staff had attended a variety of training to ensure they were able to provide care based on current practice when supporting people.

Staff gained consent before supporting people and had signed consent within their care plans. People were supported to make decisions about all aspects of their life; this was underpinned by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

People were able to make choices about the food and drink they had, and staff gave support when required. There was an onsite restaurant for people to use if they chose to.

People were supported to access a variety of additional health professionals when required. Staff provided care and support in a caring and meaningful way. They knew the people who used the service well. People and relatives, where appropriate, were involved in the planning of their care and support. People’s privacy and dignity was maintained at all times.

A complaints procedure was in place and accessible to all. People knew how to complain. Effective quality monitoring systems were in place. A variety of audits were carried out and used to drive improvement.

14 October 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection of Bakers' Villas on 14 October 2013, we saw that staff had made every effort to identify and act on the wishes of people who used the service. One person told us, 'I decide what care and support I get. We agree what I need and they [staff] provide it.'

We looked at care records which showed that people's individual needs had been assessed, documented and reviewed. They were personalised and gave staff clear guidance on how to provide the care and support people required. One person said, 'The carers look after us like family. They look after us with lots of laughter and fun. Everything is done so thoroughly. They go above and beyond what we require.'

Records showed that appropriate arrangements were in place to protect people from the risks associated with medicines.

We saw that staff had been properly supported to provide care and support to people who used the service. One member of staff told us, 'The manager is very approachable and supportive. We get lots of training courses relevant to our role.'

The provider had put systems in place to regularly assess and monitor risks and the quality of services provided to people.

6 September 2012

During a routine inspection

Following our visit we spoke with three relatives of people using the service. Everyone we spoke with said that they were very satisfied with the care provided by the service. They told us that their care workers were reliable, and provided all the care and support that they needed.

The people we spoke with told us that they were confident that the care workers had the training and support to be able to meet their needs. They said that their loved one's were treated with respect and their dignity was upheld. They told us they were involved in their care and kept informed. One relative said that the service worked very well indeed and they were contacted whenever there were any changes in their loved one's care.

They confirmed that they were consulted about the quality of the care provided. One relative told us,' It is a unique service.' They also told us, 'It has made a huge difference to the quality of my life. We are able to go out and spend quality time together.'