• Mental Health
  • NHS mental health service

Penn Hospital

Penn Road, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV4 5HN

Provided and run by:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Important: This service was previously managed by a different provider - see old profile
Important: We are carrying out a review of quality at Penn Hospital. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

All Inspections

Other CQC inspections of services

Community & mental health inspection reports for Penn Hospital can be found at Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Each report covers findings for one service across multiple locations

21 August 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

There were 49 patients at the hospital on the day of our inspection across the three wards: Dale, Brook and Meadow. 24 of the patients were detained there under the Mental Health Act.

We saw that staff treated patients with care and dignity. One patient said, 'The staff are pretty good and they treat me right.'

The physical and mental health needs of each patient were assessed, when they were admitted to hospital, to ensure these were met.

We saw that the environment was designed to reduce the risks to patients' safety. Most of the patients spoken with told us that they felt safe at the hospital. Staff were aware of how to report abuse and harm to patients so action could be taken to safeguard patients.

Staffing levels ensured that patients were safe. However, there were not always enough staff to enable patients to take part in activities and therapies to improve their health and wellbeing.

We saw that risks to the safety and patients and staff were assessed and action taken to reduce these.

Improvements were made as a result of listening to the views of patients, their relatives and staff.

10 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

There were 48 patients in the hospital on the day of our inspection. We spoke with 14 patients, 12 members of staff and feedback our findings to four managers and a psychiatrist.

At our last inspection in April 2013 we found that improvements were needed to ensure that patient's records accurately reflected what care they needed and that patients needed to be offered more opportunities to take part in meaningful activities. At this inspection we found that staff had the information they needed to know how to support patients.

We saw that patients were offered a range of meaningful activities. One patient told us, 'We can do pilates, yoga, use the gym, make jewellery, cooking, play games and go for walks. I think the activities have got better here'.

In April 2013 we also found that audits were completed and incidents were analysed but action was not taken to make improvements as a result of these. We saw that patients were asked for their views but changes were not made as a result of listening to these. At this inspection we found that improvements had been made. We saw that the results of audits were shared with staff. Managers ensured that actions to make improvements following audits were progressed to benefit patients.

Patients and staff told us that their views were listened to. One patient told us, 'There is a patient meeting every week which I attend when I can. Staff ask us what we think and listen to us.'

3 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with nine patients, two relatives who were visiting and 16 members of staff including managers. Due to their needs, some people were unable to communicate verbally with us their experiences. So, we spent time observing how staff supported and interacted with them during the day.

We saw that staff interacted well with patients and treated them with respect. One patient said, "Staff treat me with respect and always observe my dignity."

It was not clear from records sampled how the patient would be supported to meet their needs which could impact on their safety and well being.

Systems were in place to ensure that patients were safeguarded from harm. We saw that patients were comfortable in the company of staff.

A lot of building work had been completed to ensure the environment was suitable for the patients. Building work was ongoing to ensure that all patients would benefit from this.

We saw that more staff had been recruited to work there. This meant that on each ward there were enough staff with the sufficient skills to ensure that patient's needs could be met.

Staff received training and support to ensure they knew how to support patients and ensure their well being.

Patients were asked for their views about the hospital but action was not always taken in response to their comments. Audits were completed but it was not clear how improvements were made from these.

16 July 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We inspected the hospital to check compliance with the warning notices that were served to the trust in April 2012. We looked at the regulations that these related to. We visited three wards Juniper, Jasmine and Cedar. There were 20 patients on Juniper ward, 22 on Jasmine ward and 15 on Cedar ward when we visited. Nobody knew we would be visiting that day.

We spoke with seven patients. We also spoke with 15 members of staff and one relative who visited during the day. We looked at six patient's records and sampled the provider's records.

The current wards were unsuitable for the purpose of accommodating people who have mental ill health. Therefore, building works were being undertaken at the time of our visit in a part of the hospital where patients were not accommodated. It is hoped that this work will be completed by the end of 2012 and will provide better, more suitable accommodation.

We found that the warning notices had been complied with and improvements had been made to ensure the safety and welfare of patients. We saw that the provider had plans in place so that these improvements could be sustained.

Patients were asked to consent to their care and treatment. Where patients did not have the mental capacity to consent to this, decisions were made about their care and treatment that were in their best interests.

Patients told us and we saw that they were involved in their care plans and were asked to sign these so that they were able to agree to the care that they received. If they did not want to sign, this was recorded in their notes. Care plans showed staff how to support the patient to meet their needs and reduce the risks to their safety.

Occupational Therapists were employed on each ward and a varied programme of activities were offered to patients. Staff worked with patients and tried to offer them something they would enjoy and most patients engaged in these activities. Some patients who were very unwell said that they did not do activities. However, we saw that staff tried to involve each patient and offered them opportunities to promote their well being.

We saw that staff interacted well with patients and spent time talking to and listening to them. One patient said, "The staff are really good."

Records showed and staff and patients told us that patients' physical health was monitored and regularly checked. This ensured that staff considered all the patient's needs and were aware that their physical health needs were important and could impact on their mental health needs.

Patients told us and we saw that they were involved in meetings on the ward and when they raised issues, changes were made to benefit them. Patients told us they knew how to complain if they needed to. We saw that complaints were listened to and improvements made as a result.

Regular audits were completed to ensure that patients health and safety were maintained. We saw and staff told us that when audits were completed, action was taken where needed, to make improvements that would benefit patients, staff and visitors.

15 March 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We visited three wards and during our time at the hospital spoke with people who used the service. Some people welcomed discussion with us; some declined and did not wish to do so. People told us that the staff were 'very good', 'staff helped me through some difficult times', and 'I get on well with the staff, they are always very busy'. One person told us that there was 'always something going on' so as not to get bored. Another person told us they spend the majority of the day watching television and smoking. People told us they enjoyed the food but sometimes the desserts were boring with not much variety.

We spent time in the communal areas, chatting with people who used the service and observing the interactions between them and the staff. We saw some people being supported on a one-to-one basis when they were at risk of harm to themselves and possibly to other people. We saw staff being very vigilant, supporting people in a competent and calm way. We saw that the privacy and dignity of some people was not always upheld by the working practices of staff. Some people told us they were comfortable, we saw other people appearing not so.

We looked at a selection of care records including risk assessments and support plans. In the files we looked at we saw that each person had a very detailed plan of care for their mental health care needs. We did not see, and staff could not produce, a similar plan of care for physical health care needs. We saw inconsistencies and omissions of recording a person's consent to their care and treatment. We saw that a mental capacity and best interest assessment had been completed where a person was unable to make decisions for themselves.

We saw that some improvements had been made to the storage of medication. A treatment room on one ward had been re-sited and was now in a much safer area. We saw that action had not been taken when it was identified that the fridge for the cool storage of medication was not at the correct temperature or when the daily temperature was not recorded.

Staff told us the action they would take if they had any suspicions of abuse, this was consistent with their job role. One staff was not quite sure but would report any concerns to the person in charge. Staff told us and we saw that the least restrictive course of action was taken when people were at risk of harm.

We saw that improvements have been made to the environment when issues regarding the safety of people within the wards were identified. We were told of the plans for major works to the building to begin in April 2012 this to improve the facilities. Staff told us there will be additional communal space for people as well as single occupancy bedrooms for all people.

Staff told us that the staffing levels on the wards have improved and that generally there were sufficient numbers of staff to meet the needs of people. They told us that sometimes staff call in sick at short notice and at times it was difficult to arrange cover. They told us that bank staff usually fill in the gaps. One staff member told us the bank staff were 'a regular bunch of people'.

Most staff told us that opportunities for training was 'much better than it was', with the majority of staff spoken with confirming they had received mandatory training. All staff were to be provided with training passports which direct them to the frequency and the subject area required for their job.

We were told of the systems in place for monitoring and assessing the quality and safety of the service. We saw that audits were being completed but found they were not as effective as they should be.

1 August 2011

During a routine inspection

Most people we spoke with during our visits to the hospital were generally satisfied with the care, treatment and support that is provided. They said that the staff were kind, patient and understanding. They told us that the staff take the time to explain 'things' to them in a way that they could understand.

Some people told us that they were aware that they had a written plan of their care needs. Other people were unaware of this. People said they were usually consulted on the treatment that they were to receive, with staff explaining the reasons behind a particular treatment.

Some people commented that the food could be improved and that more fresh fruit would be beneficial. Some people told us they were able to make drinks for themselves when they wished to have a drink. Other people told us they had to ask the staff for refreshments as there was no facility for making drinks on this particular ward.

Some people were aware of the dedicated activity suite within the hospital; others told us they were unaware of this facility. Some people told us that they liked to participate in the various activity sessions that are arranged during the day. Others declined to participate. One person commented that they felt it was important to keep busy and occupied during the day to overcome the monotony of being in hospital.

Some people told us that they were very much at ease in the ward environment. Other people told us that they did not feel safe and that there was not enough staff around to protect them. They commented that there were too many 'blind spots' around the ward which made them feel very vulnerable.

People told us that the staff were very diligent with supporting them to take their medication, and if they asked for their medication the staff would give it to them without much delay.

In some areas around the hospital people told us it was too noisy, too hot or too cold.