• Hospital
  • NHS hospital

Archived: Trafford General Hospital

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Moorside Road, Davyhulme, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M41 5SL (0161) 276 1234

Provided and run by:
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Important: This service was previously managed by a different provider - see old profile
Important: This service is now managed by a different provider - see new profile

All Inspections

3-6 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Trafford Hospital is part of Central Manchester Foundation Trust and provides a range of hospital services, including an urgent care facility, general and specialist medicine, general and specialist surgery a paediatric hospital service for children and young people and a range of outpatient and diagnostic services for adults and children.

Trafford Hospital is situated in Trafford and serves a population of approximately 226,600 people residing in the surrounding area of Trafford, Altrincham and Greater Manchester., the hospital has approximately 230 inpatient beds.

We carried out this inspection as part of our scheduled program of announced inspections

We visited the hospital on 4 and 5 November 2015. During this inspection, the team inspected the following core services:

  • Urgent Care services
  • Medical care services (including older people’s care)
  • Surgery
  • Children and young people's services
  • End of life care
  • Outpatients and diagnostic services

Overall, we rated Trafford Hospital as ‘good’. However Medical care services were judged as requiring improvement in the responsive domain and services provided to people at the end of life required improvement in all areas apart from caring which was judged as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

Leadership and management

  • The hospital was led and managed by a cohesive and visible senior team. The team were very well known to staff and were regular and frequent visitors to the wards and departments.
  • The Head of Nursing was well regarded by all departments who felt supported and valued.
  • Staff were engaged and were committed to Trafford hospital providing a high quality service for patients and their friends and families.
  • There was a positive culture throughout the hospital. Staff were open and honest and were very proud of the work they did and proud of the services they provided.
  • Although there was additional work to be done to support staff in feeling part of the wider trust. Overall staff morale was good with the exception of some medical staff who were concerned regarding the number and complexity of services being delivered at the hospital.

Access and Flow

  • Data showed that 99% of patients presenting to the urgent care centre were seen within four hours.
  • All patients we spoke with told us they were seen quickly and expressed no concerns about waiting times.
  • Staff told us that availability of beds for patients who required admission to the hospital was good and that they did not experience delays in transferring patients to wards. However delays were experienced in transferring patients over to the acute hospitals in particular Manchester Royal Infirmary.
  • There was a divisional and departmental escalation policy in place. This policy guided staff on steps to take if patients were in the centre for longer than expected or were waiting excessive times for an inpatient bed.
  • A winter pressures plan was in place for the Trafford Division
  • The medical service was experiencing significant challenges with access and flow. Ten ambulatory care areas in the Medical Assessment Unit were regularly being used as inpatient beds increasing the pressures on staffing on the unit. There were delayed discharges across the service due to a lack of intermediate care and re-ablement beds and waiting for packages of care to be put in place. Some discharge delays were caused on Ward 3 by the wait for specialist community care funding and on Ward 2 by the lack of funding provision for overseas patients. The service was working to address these issues but at the time of our inspection timely discharge remained a challenge.
  • Discharge arrangements were initiated upon admission. Discharge summaries were sent to the patients’ general practitioner (GP) and there were procedures to enlist support from social services and district nurses if necessary. Staff completed a ‘nurse led’ discharge form that included information about medication and copy of the discharge letter for the family to inform about the care during the hospital stay.
  • Theatre utilisation was 70.4% between August and October 2015, this was based on high cancellation rates and inefficient organisation of theatre lists. Whilst the local management were keen to increase utilisation and had made some improvements (up from 62% for the previous 3 months), This had been recognised by the Trust and an external consultant had been commissioned to work with staff to develop options for expanding the service and increase the utilisation of the surgical services for Children and young people at the hospital.
  • The average referral to treatment time was 13 weeks and for some specialties such as Gynaecology, was as low as 5 weeks.
  • Trust data showed that a total of 1149 operations were carried out, in Trafford, on children and young people (18 years and under) between October 2014 and September 2015.
  • The trust recorded incidents when patient records were not available prior to surgery, resulting in cancellations of procedures, or have arrived later than planned from RMCH.
  • Patients at the end of their life were not always seen within 24 hours of referral to the Specialist Palliative Care Team particularly if they were referred at the weekend. Data provided by the trust showed that in the three months at the beginning of 2015 75% of patients were seen within 24 hours of being referred to the SPCT. However the data provided did not give information about how long the 25% not seen in 24hours waited to be seen by the team.
  • From August to October 2015 there were 3912 outpatients clinics held at the hospital, an average of 1304 per month.
  • Patients use the “Choose and Book” system, which gives them choice when booking and outpatient appointment.
  • In February 2015, the Endoscopy Unit was able to offer 61% of patients a choice of appointment times on the day of their procedure.When we inspected, this figure had dropped to 20% and this was because patients referred from Manchester Royal Infirmary were filling up clinics. This is increasing patient flow at the Trafford site.
  • In the period April 2015-September 2015, 93.6% of patients at Trafford had started outpatient treatment within 18 weeks of referral (referral to treatment (RTT)).
  • The percentage of people waiting over six weeks for a diagnostic test at Trafford General Hospital was 0.8%. This was better than the England average.
  • On the days that we inspected the services, we saw that patients were seen promptly and well inside the 30 minutes recommended in national guidelines. When we spoke to patients, they reported that they had never had a long wait in the clinic before their appointment.
  • The percentage of patients who did not attend their appointment (DNA rate) between April and September was an average of 8.0%.This is better than the England average for the same period of 8.8%.

Cleanliness and Infection control

  • Patients were cared for in a visibly clean and hygienic environment.
  • Staff followed the trust policy on infection control and adhered to the ‘bare below the elbows’ policy.
  • Cleaning schedules were in place, and there were clearly defined roles and responsibilities for cleaning the environment and cleaning and decontaminating equipment.
  • There were arrangements in place for the handling, storage and disposal of clinical waste, including sharps. There was a suitable supply of hand wash sinks and hand gels available.
  • Staff were observed wearing personal protective equipment, such as gloves and aprons, while delivering care. Gowning procedures were adhered to in the theatre areas.
  • Patients identified with an infection were isolated in side rooms. We saw that appropriate signage was used to protect staff and visitors. The hospital had employed infection control link nurses. Their role was to provide training and to liaise with staff so patients that acquired infections could be identified and treated promptly.

Nurse staffing

  • Nurse staffing levels were determined using an evidence based tool.
  • The expected and actual staffing levels were displayed on a board on each unit/ward and these were updated on a daily basis.
  • Staffing levels were planned to ensure an appropriate skill mix to provide care and treatment for patients.
  • However, nurse staffing levels, although improved, remained a challenge in some areas. This was particularly the case in medical care services. Staffing levels were maintained by staff regularly working overtime and with the use of bank or agency staff. Where possible, regular agency and bank staff were used which meant they were familiar with policies and procedures. Any new agency staff received an induction prior to working on the wards.
  • The trust had implemented a number of initiatives to address shortages in nurse staffing including: actively recruiting nursing staff from overseas and linking with local universities.

Medical staffing

  • Medical treatment was delivered by skilled and committed medical staff.
  • The medical staffing skill mix was sufficient in the urgent care department when compared with the England average. Consultants made up 22% of the medical workforce across the urgent care division which was 1% lower than the England average of 23%. However, there were more registrar group doctors who made up 64% of the medical workforce compared with the England average of 39%. 15% of the medical workforce were made up of junior doctors which was lower than the England average of 24%.
  • There were three consultants working within the urgent care centre. They worked on a rota basis to provide cover between 8am and 8pm. Consultant cover after 8pm was available on an on call basis.
  • There was no resident paediatric doctor based in Children’s Resource Centre, however; doctors told us that there were medical staff in attendance for out – patient clinics each day.
  • Doctors told us that, if a child or young person needed to be reviewed by a doctor, post – operatively, there were doctors, with the necessary competencies and skills available on – site, at Trafford, either in out – patient areas or the theatre suites.
  • There were three consultants in post and two consultant radiologist vacancies at Trafford and Altrincham. There was a plan in place to mitigate for these shortages by recruiting an additional consultant and introducing a consultant rota across the trust.
  • The reporting turnaround times in the Radiology Directorate are adversely affected because of staff vacancies. There are plans, in the interim, to increase the outsourcing of plain imaging and increase the use of outsourcing companies for CT and MR imaging to reduce reporting times.
  • The Diabetes Centre has a Consultant vacancy and the Consultant currently employed also works in Endocrinology. Consultants on short-term contracts, locums and GPs with a special interest in diabetes have covered the staffing gap.

Nutrition and hydration

  • Wards had access to a dietician if required.
  • The nutritional needs of patients were assessed and recorded in their notes and are highlighted on large noticeboard so they can be assessed ‘at a glance’.
  • There was a red tray system in place which meant that patients who needed extra support at mealtimes were easily identifiable.
  • Patients needing assistance were also identified on a board in the ward kitchen.
  • Patients were satisfied with the standard of food provided at the hospital.

We saw several areas of outstanding practise Including

  • Multidisciplinary work with other agencies to manage frequently attending patients.
  • Collaborative working with AGE UK, Stroke Association and Trafford Carers Association.
  • Patient tracker system and ‘tell us today’ initiatives to improve patient experience feedback.
  • Staff approach to patient care and commitment to providing outstanding, compassionate care to patients.

However, there were areas of practice that required improvement. Importantly, the trust MUST:

  • Ensure that it fully implements the national recommendations following the removal of the Liverpool Care Pathway

Action the hospital SHOULD take to improve

In urgent care services:

  • All records within the urgent care centre should be kept in a secure location.

In medical care services:

  • Ensure that all medical staff receive the correct level of mandatory training within the required timescales to ensure they have the right level of skills and competencies to safely fulfil their roles.
  • Nurse staffing levels should be increased to meet the minimum day time requirement of 1:8 nurse patient ratio recommended by NICE (Safe staffing for nursing in adult inpatient wards in acute hospitals).

In surgery:

  • Consider improving the inpatient environment for people living with Dementia as it is could be made more ‘dementia friendly’.
  • Improve the theatre utilisation and theatre list compilation efficiency.
  • Investigate the high rates of patients not attending for scheduled procedures with a view to reducing the rates of non-attendance.

In Children and young people’s services

  • Monitor the integration of the services with RMCH, including development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s) and audits of care to demonstrate effective care.
  • Develop the service and be able to evidence safe care e.g. risk assessments and training data.
  • Ensure facilities are suitable and responsive for children and young people of all ages in the local community.

In End of life care services

  • The trust should have in place a vison and strategy for end of life care services for Trafford Hospital.
  • The trust should ensure that it has sufficient specialist staff to support the demand for end of life care in the trust.
  • The trust should review its access to specialist palliative care over 24 hours (seven days) in line with national guidance for end of life care.
  • The trust should review the leadership for palliative care at Trafford Hospital to reflect the needs of people at end of life and their loved ones.
  • The trust should ensure that robust audit of end of life care is in place particularly the use of the DNACPR process and documentation.

In outpatients and diagnostic imaging services:

  • Consider what actions can be taken to reduce the reporting turnaround times for urodynamics.
  • Consider how privacy can be improved at reception areas in radiology and orthopaedic outpatients.
  • Consider improving facilities for patients to comment on their care and treatment (Patient Tracker pedestals and Friends and Family forms).

Professor Sir Mike Richards

Chief Inspector of Hospitals

17, 18 February 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

Before our inspection we had received concerning information that care at Trafford General Hospital (TGH) was not always planned and delivered in a safe and appropriate way. The information we received was particularly in relation to Ward 4 and the acute medical unit (AMU), formally the medical assessment unit. We also had concerns that complaints and incidents were not being managed and responded to in a timely manner.

During our inspection we spoke with 30 patients and the relatives of four patients. Overall people told us they were happy with the care they had received during their stay at the hospital. One person told us: 'I think we get very good care, you feel safe and secure.' Patients were particularly positive about the attitudes of staff. One person said: 'Everybody is so lovely.' Another person told us: 'Even to the cleaners, they go out of their way.'

We found the provider had identified risks to patient care particularly around falls management. In response we found that they had implemented a number of changes to address and manage these risks and could demonstrate that there had been improvements in patient care as a result.

A range of risk assessments and care plans were completed for each patient in order to identify their needs and plan appropriate care. Monitoring systems were in place to ensure care plans and assessments were followed. These allowed staff to monitor and adapt the care and support they provided to people as needed.

The provider had identified that there were issues with the current complaints process and could demonstrate the action they were taking to address these issues. There were systems in place to review complaints and incidents in order to prevent reoccurrence and improve the quality of the service provided.

Where we identified any concerns or areas for improvement, the provider was able to demonstrate that they were aware of the issues and had plans in place to address them. This meant the provider was taking steps to ensure patients safety and welfare was promoted. We will continue to monitor Trafford General Hospital to ensure they continue to improve and maintain compliance.

18 September 2012

During a routine inspection

Patients we spoke with felt they were treated with respect and dignity and were involved in making decisions about their care, treatment and support during their stay at the hospital. Patients we spoke with were very positive about the care and support they had received. One patient said, 'They (staff) couldn't have looked after me better'.

A relative of a patient told us, 'they've (staff) been very good' and another told us that they were happy with the care their relative had received.

We found risk assessments and care plans were in place for patient falls, the use of bed rails and pressure ulcer/care.

We observed that patients appeared relaxed and confident around staff and comfortable in their presence.

We found that nursing staff had a good understanding of safeguarding practice, their responsibility to keep patients safe and what action they would take in response to concerns.

We found that a high number of agency staff had been used at the hospital but following a recruitment drive a number of permanent nursing staff had been employed.