• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Old Manse

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

243 Main Road, Biggin Hill, Westerham, Kent, TN16 3JY (01959) 571695

Provided and run by:
HF Trust Limited

All Inspections

9 March 2015

During a routine inspection

The Old Manse is a residential care home for people with learning disabilities. The home is registered to provide care and accommodation for eight people and is located in the London Borough of Bromley. At the time of our inspection seven people were using the service.

This inspection took place on 9 March 2015 and was unannounced. At our previous inspection on 28 January 2014 the service was meeting the regulations inspected.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they liked living at the Old Manse and said staff were kind and caring towards them. Relatives were positive about the service provided and said they could visit at any time. There was a relaxed, friendly and homely atmosphere when we visited.

There were clear procedures in place to recognise and respond to abuse and staff had been trained in how to follow these. Staffing numbers were sufficient to help make sure people were kept safe.

People received care in line with their wishes and preferences. Each person had an individualised support plan and activity schedule to make sure they received the support they required.

People were supported to have their health needs met. Staff at the Old Manse worked with other healthcare professionals and obtained specialist advice as appropriate to help make sure individual health needs were met. We saw that people’s prescribed medicines were being stored securely and managed safely.

Staff attended regular training which gave them the knowledge and skills to support people effectively. Staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). People were asked for their consent to the care and support they received. Staff were aware where people did not have the capacity to consent to some aspects of their care and acted in their best interests.

People and their relatives said they felt able to speak to the registered manager or other staff to raise any issues or concerns.

The registered manager supported staff to deliver appropriate care and support. There were effective systems to monitor the quality of the service and obtain feedback from people and their representatives.

28 January 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

On this occasion, we did not speak with people using the service as part of our inspection. We found the provider had made improvements to ensure that before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes. The provider had also made some improvements to ensure staff were receiving effective training and supervision.

4 September 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us they received good care at the home. They said their needs were looked after well. One person said staff were 'very friendly'. They said they were involved in the care planning. 'I attend meetings. We book our holidays. I certainly like it', said one person who lived at the home.

We found that people were treated with respect and dignity, and their care and treatment was planned in accordance with their assessed needs. The provider worked with other health and care professionals to ensure people received safe care. However we found

that the provider had not always assessed correctly people's capacity to make decisions, and all staff were not up-to-date with their training and supervision.