• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: St John's Cottage

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Hospital Road, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN13 3PH (01732) 457800

Provided and run by:
HF Trust Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

25 April 2016

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 21 and 25 April 2016 and was announced. St John’s Cottage is a small care home located in Sevenoaks and provides accommodation and personal care for up to eight people with learning disabilities.

The home is a detached property located near Sevenoaks Town Centre. At the time of our inspection there were eight people living at the home some of whom required support to manage health conditions such as diabetes. The service did not have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. Interim management arrangements were in place to cover the service whilst recruitment to the post was in progress and the provider’s operations manager had submitted an application to be the new registered manager.

Although people told us they felt safe, we found that one person had not been given the correct amount of medicine because the registered provider had not ensure that there was safe management and administration of medicines.

The registered provider had not ensured that monitoring checks and audits undertaken were effective, identified concerns and led to improvement.

Staff knew how to protect people from abuse and harm and were clear about their responsibilities. Risk assessments were person centred and gave staff clear guidance regarding people’s individual needs. Staffing levels were based on people’s support needs and were reviewed in line with people’s changing needs. Records showed that recruitment procedures were followed to ensure staff were suitable to work with people.

Staff knew people well and provided effective care that was based on detailed guidelines and effective communication. Staff received guidance, support and training according to people’s needs. We observed that staff sought people’s consent before providing care and support. Staff and management understood and followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People were supported to eat a balanced diet that met their needs and preferences and received care and support that promoted their health and wellbeing. People were referred to health care professionals when needed and there were strong links with a wide range of health professionals.

Relationships between people and staff were positive and people were respected and treated with dignity. People were encouraged to be involved in all aspects of the home and their independence valued and supported. Care and support was based on people's preferences, likes and dislikes. People led active lives and were supported to maintain their relationships and undertake a range of activities. People’s support plans were reviewed regularly and updated when their needs changed to ensure they received the support they required. People’s feedback was actively sought and there were a range of ways people could give feedback or raise a complaint. The provider had developed effective links with organisations that helped them develop best practice and opportunities for people.

We found two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

13 September 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we talked with people who used the service and we observed the staff interacting with people who used the service in a respectful and positive way.

People we spoke with told us that they had input into their care plans and we saw from the records we looked at that people who used the service had participated in care plan reviews.

All of the care plans we viewed had been signed by the person who used the service and contained needs assessments and individual risk assessments.

We spoke to three people who used the service and they told us that they were well supported, one said 'I am happy here, I go out on my own to meet friends and the house is nice and homely' another said 'I enjoy being independent and I know I have got rights.'

During our inspection we spoke to the staff on site and they were able to describe whistleblowing and safeguarding processes. We saw that in the staff area there was a large poster giving information to staff about who they could contact if they wanted to report abuse or suspected abuse.

We spoke to staff who told us that they were well supported by the registered manager, one said 'I get good support from my line manager' another said 'I enjoy my job and I am well supported by the registered manager'.

Records were kept securely and could be located promptly when needed.