Archived: Aldingbourne Cottage

Updated 7 March 2016

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 21 December 2015 and 26 January 2016. One inspector undertook this inspection.

Before the inspection we checked the information that we held about the service and the service provider. This included statutory notifications sent to us by the registered manager about incidents and events that had occurred at the service. A notification is information about important events which the service is required to send to us by law. We used all this information to decide which areas to focus on during our inspection.

During our inspection we observed how staff interacted with people who used the service. We looked at how people were supported in the communal areas of the home. We also looked at plans of care, risk assessments, incident records and medicines records for two people. We looked at training and recruitment records for two members of staff. We also looked at staffing rotas, staff handover records, minutes of meetings with people and staff, records of activities undertaken, menus, staff training and recruitment records, and records relating to the management of the service such as audits and policies.

On the first day of our visit the registered manager was not available and we were assisted by the senior staff member on duty who was able to tell us about the service and provide us with written records. We went back to the service for a second visit to enable us to speak with the registered manager and to look at those records that were not available to us on the first day of the visit, We spoke with four people and two relatives to ask them their views of the service provided. We also spoke to the deputy manager and two members of staff.

The service was last inspected on 6 February 2014 and there were no concerns.

Updated 7 March 2016

Aldingbourne Cottage is a 10 bedded care home without nursing providing 24 hour care for people with learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder and/or physical disability in the village of Westgate, Chichester. At the time of our inspection there were five people living at the home

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe with staff. Relatives had no concerns about the safety of people. There were policies and procedures regarding the safeguarding of adults and staff knew what action to take if they thought anyone was at risk of potential harm.

Potential risks to people had been identified and assessed appropriately. There were sufficient numbers of staff to support people and safe recruitment practices were followed. Medicines were managed safely.

Staff had received all essential training and there were opportunities for them to study for additional qualifications. All staff training was up-to-date. Team meetings were held and staff had regular communication with each other at handover meetings which took place between each shift.

The CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. We found the registered manager understood when an application should be made and how to submit one. We found the provider to be meeting the requirements of DoLS. The registered manager and staff were guided by the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) regarding best interests decisions should anyone be deemed to lack capacity.

People were supported to have sufficient to eat and drink and to maintain a healthy diet. They had access to healthcare professionals. People’s rooms were decorated in line with their personal preferences.

Staff knew people well and positive, caring relationships had been developed. People were encouraged to express their views and these were communicated to staff in a variety of ways – verbally, through physical gestures or body language. People were involved in decisions about their care as much as they were able. Their privacy and dignity were respected and promoted. Staff understood how to care for people in a sensitive way.

Care plans provided information about people in a person-centred way. People’s personal histories had been recorded and their preferences, likes and dislikes were documented so that staff knew how people wished to be supported. Some people went to a day centre during the day and there was a variety of activities and outings on offer which people could choose to do. Complaints were dealt with in line with the provider’s policy and there had been no formal complaints logged in the previous year.

People could express their views and discuss any issues or concerns with their keyworker, who co-ordinated all aspects of their care. The culture of the service was homely and family-orientated. Regular audits measured the quality of the care and service provided.