You are here

The provider of this service changed - see old profile

We have not inspected this service yet

Inspection summaries and ratings from previous provider


Overall summary & rating

Requires improvement

Updated 16 January 2020

About the service

Harmony House is a care home, which provides accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 57 older people, some of whom are living with complex health conditions or dementia. The home has two floors, with numerous communal lounges, and a dining area. People had their own en-suite bedrooms. There is a communal garden area. At the time of our inspection there were 42 people living at Harmony House.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People told us they were happy living at Harmony House and described the home as having a happy atmosphere with things to do. Staff demonstrated a kind and caring approach toward people and gave support when needed.

Most risks were well managed, and staff had risk management plans to refer to telling them how to reduce risks of harm or injury to people. However, some risks had not been identified by the provider or registered manager and this posed risks of harm to people.

Staff were trained and offered opportunities to develop their skills and knowledge. However, the provider and registered manager had not ensured staff always had the guidance they needed to use all equipment safely, such as specialist beds.

People had all their prescribed tablet medicines available to them, but staff did not always ensure people had their prescribed topical medicines. Staff did not always follow manufacturer’s guidance in how medicines should be given through the skin.

People had choices about drinks and what they ate for their main meals. However, appropriate nutritional snacks were not always made available to meet people’s dietary requirements.

The home was well-maintained and good cleanliness reduced risks of cross infection.

Staff understood the importance of giving people choices. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People’s needs were assessed, and information was used to form plans of care. Work was ongoing to further personalise people’s care plans.

There were enough staff on shift to meet people’s needs. Improvement had been made to ensure staff consistently worked on one floor of the home so people were cared for and supported by the same staff. Staff were recruited in a safe way.

There were systems in place for people and relatives to give their feedback on the service. The provider’s complaints policy was displayed, and concerns were acted on.

Improvements had been made to staff morale and they felt supported by the registered manager.

There were processes to audit the quality and safety of the service. Some issues had been identified as requiring improvements and were acted on. However, some audits, checks and oversight of staff were not robust enough and had not identified where improvements were needed. Intended improvements were not always sustained by staff or embedded in the culture of the home.

Following our inspection feedback, the regional manager and registered manager took some immediate actions to make improvements. This included increased managerial oversight to ensure people were offered appropriate and nutritional snacks.

We reported that the registered provider was in breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These were:

Regulation 17 Regulated Activities Regulations 2014 – Good governance

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at the last inspection

The last rating for this service was Requires Improvement (published 4 January 2019). The service has been repeatedly rated Requires Improvement since 2015.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the rating of the last inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our

Inspection areas

Safe

Requires improvement

Updated 16 January 2020

The service was not consistently safe.

Details are in our safe findings below.

Effective

Requires improvement

Updated 16 January 2020

The service was not consistently effective.

Details are in our effective findings below.

Caring

Good

Updated 16 January 2020

The service was caring.

Details are in our caring findings below.

Responsive

Good

Updated 16 January 2020

The service was responsive.

Details are in our responsive findings below.

Well-led

Requires improvement

Updated 16 January 2020

The service was not consistently well led.

Details can be found in our well led findings below.