• Care Home
  • Care home

Gables Manor

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Ingleby, Saxilby, Lincoln, LN1 2PQ (01522) 704250

Provided and run by:
National Care Consortium Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

26 April 2023

During a routine inspection

About the service

Gables Manor is a nursing home providing personal and nursing care for up to a maximum of 19 people. The service provides support to people with a learning disability, physical disability and autistic people. At the time of our inspection there were 19 people using the service. The service is a large, adapted building across 2 floors with access to the second floor by stairs or a lift.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

Right Support:

People were supported to have choice and control of their lives; however, it was not always possible to ascertain from records whether staff were supporting them in the least restrictive way and in their best interests. Risks to people were assessed and monitored, however risk assessments and care plans did not always reflect the most important and up to date information. Staff supported people to access health and social care support in the community and supported people to be involved in maintaining their own health and wellbeing where possible. People could communicate and understand information given to them because they were receiving consistent support from regular staff. Staff were recruited safely and had the necessary skills, knowledge, and experience to provide safe and effective care. There were enough staff to meet people's needs. People were able to choose activities and pursue volunteer work that was tailored to them.

Right Care:

Staff were appropriately trained and understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse, however unexplained injuries were not always reported to management when required. Care records contained risk assessments with guidance for staff to follow, however they did not always contain all the relevant information found in other sections of care plans. Medicines were managed safely, although care plans had not always been updated following changes. Some areas in the premises were not clean and there were some concerns relating to the environment that posed an infection, prevention control risk. Support was person-centred and promoted people's dignity, privacy, and human rights, however staff had used informal language in some people’s care plans that could be seen as disrespectful. People had a choice about their living environment and were able to personalise their rooms. The service worked together with healthcare professionals and relatives to ensure people's assessed needs were met.

Right Culture:

The registered manager promoted a person-centred environment and people spoke positively about the management team and staff; however, the providers quality monitoring systems were very informal and had failed to mitigate the risks in relation to incident reporting and post-incident analysis reviews. Care plan audits were not effective in ensuring they contained the most relevant and up to date information about people to keep them safe. Some records needed to be reviewed to ensure all information was written respectfully. Staff were responsive to people's needs and evaluated the quality of support provided to people, involving the person, their families and other professionals as appropriate.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 11 May 2020. The last focused inspection (published 14 October 2020) meant the service did not receive an overall rating.

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the safe and well-led sections of this full report.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report. The provider has taken action to mitigate risks following our inspection.

You can read the report from our last focused inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Gables Manor on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified breaches in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance at this inspection.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

16 September 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Gables Manor is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Gables Manor provides accommodation for people living with a learning disability.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. It was registered for the support of up to 19 people and 19 people were using the service. This is larger than current best practice guidance. However, the size of the service having a negative impact on people was mitigated by the building design. fitting into the residential area and the other large domestic homes of a similar size.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Medicines were administered safely however; medicine records were not consistently completed.

Processes to complete quality checks were in place. These were carried out on a regular basis. The home was clean, and staff understood how to prevent and manage infections. The home had put in place arrangements to manage the risk of cross infection during the pandemic. Staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) according to national guidance.

There was enough staff to support people. Appropriate employment checks had been carried out to ensure staff were suitable to work with vulnerable people. Arrangements were in place to safeguard people against harm. People said they felt safe.

People’s dietary needs were met. This information was detailed in people’s care plans. Staff followed guidance provided to manage people's nutrition. People were supported by staff who had received training to ensure their needs could be met. Staff received regular supervision to support their role.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People had good health care support from external professionals. When people were unwell, staff had raised concerns and acted with health professionals to address their health care needs.

The provider had displayed the latest CQC rating at the home and on their website. When required notifications had been completed to inform us of events and incidents.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent. More information is in the detailed findings below.

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 18 May 2020 and this is the first inspection. The last rating for the service under the previous provider/at the previous premises was good, published on 13 March 2020.

Why we inspected

We had concerns in relation to infection control and use of PPE. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe, effective and well-led only. We reviewed the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other key questions.

We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the safe section of this full report.

Follow up

We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.