• Care Home
  • Care home

Burrow Down Shortbreaks

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Lynwood, Jacks Lane, Torquay, TQ2 8QX (01803) 323528

Provided and run by:
Burrow Down Support Services Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 22 October 2025

Date of assessment: 28 October to 24 November 2025.

An assessment has been undertaken of this specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Burrow Down Shortbreaks, known as Lynwood Lodge, is a residential care home that provides respite care for up to 6 people who have a learning disability, autistic people, and people with additional associated needs such as physical disability, sensory impairment, and complex behaviours. At the time of the inspection, 8 people were using the service. 6 people were staying at Lynwood Lodge in a residential area of Torquay, and 2 people were being supported at a holiday park. This second location is not registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide care.

This was a responsive assessment following concerns identified at one of the provider’s other registered locations. During this assessment, we reviewed 21 quality statements and identified 4 breaches of legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, need for consent, recruitment, and governance.

People were not always protected from the risk of harm because staff did not consistently have all the information needed to meet people’s needs safely. Systems and processes had not been fully developed or embedded to ensure safety concerns were identified and learning was shared. This meant people were at risk of receiving care and support that did not always promote their well-being or protect them from avoidable harm.

The registered manager promoted an open and honest culture where people felt able to speak up and have their voices heard. They recognised the importance of partnership working to improve outcomes and ensured people could access a range of healthcare services. During the assessment, the registered and deputy managers were transparent, acknowledged areas for improvement, and demonstrated a commitment to addressing concerns.

At this assessment, the overall rating has changed from good to requires improvement. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward. In addition, we have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

People's experience of the service

Updated 22 October 2025

Relatives expressed confidence in the service, including the staff and management team. They told us that people felt safe and were happy with the support provided by Burrowdown Short Breaks. Comments included: “Our relative is safe emotionally and, in every aspect,” “My relative is safe, they [meaning staff] are kind and caring and show respect for dignity. I am happy with all that they do,” and “The staff are amazing. I cannot praise them enough.”

Although relatives told us they were happy with the service, our assessment found several areas of care and support that did not meet expected standards. The provider was unable to demonstrate how they fully met the key principles of Right Support, Right Care, and Right Culture.

Right Support: People were not always supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives, and staff were not supporting people in the least restrictive way possible. The service could not always demonstrate they were acting in people’s best interests.

People were not always protected from the risk of harm, as staff did not always have all of the information needed to meet people's needs safely.

Right Care: People’s care was not always delivered in a way which met their assessed needs. People were consistently treated with dignity and respect, staff knew people well and understood how to communicate effectively with them.

Right Culture: The service was not operating in accordance with the regulations and best practice guidance. The management team had created an open and transparent culture, where constructive feedback was encouraged. Relatives knew how to make a complaint and were confident their concerns would be addressed.