• Care Home
  • Care home

Wellfield Also known as Wellfield Pines and Wellfield Acorn

City Gate, Gallowgate, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4PA (0161) 945 1378

Provided and run by:
Oakfield Psychological Services Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Updated 28 May 2026

We have not rated the service at this assessment. Previous enforcement action was in place because of concerns about safety, risk management and governance. At this assessment, we found the provider had made clear improvements. Leaders now had better oversight of the service, staff understood how to recognise, record and escalate incidents, and there was evidence that risks, incidents and near misses were reviewed and used to improve practice. Risk assessments and care plans were detailed, child-centred and regularly reviewed, and staff used clear strategies to support children safely, including adapted communication, visual prompts, reassurance and least restrictive approaches. Medicines were managed safely, with appropriate storage, stock checks, MAR processes, nurse oversight and regular audits. Safeguarding arrangements were effective, staff had received relevant training, and staff told us they felt able to raise concerns.

Children received personalised care and treatment that met their complex health, emotional and communication needs. Staff worked well with health, education, social care professionals and families to plan and review care. Since the last assessment, the provider has improved engagement with CQC and partner agencies, strengthened staff training and clinical oversight, and developed clearer systems for monitoring risks, incidents, medicines, supervision and care planning. These improvements meant children were now supported by staff who understood their needs and worked in a more coordinated and responsive way. We found no breaches at this assessment.

People's experience of the service

Updated 28 May 2026

During this assessment we gathered evidence about children’s experience through speaking with them where appropriate, observing their environment and interactions, and reviewing records about their care, routines, communication and family involvement. Their experiences were positive and personalised. Staff knew what was important to them and used communication tools, visual prompts, choices and familiar routines to help them express their views and take part in day-to-day decisions. Bedroom’s, bathroom and living spaces reflected their interests and preferences. For example, they had chosen their wallpaper and told us the bathroom looked “spacious and bright”.

 

Our observations showed children were supported to build confidence, independence and relationships. Staff encouraged them to attend school, spend time with family, go shopping, take part in activities and develop daily living skills. Records and feedback showed the children had made progress in their confidence, emotional wellbeing, mobility and school attendance. Staff recognised how children communicated through words, behaviour, mood boards, visual prompts and choices, and adapted their approach to reduce anxiety and support their dignity. We did not find evidence of inequalities in the children’s experience or human rights breaches at this assessment.