• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Newmedica Community Ophthalmology Service Also known as Teesside Newmedica Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

29 -30 Market Place, North Ormesby, Middlesbrough, TS3 6HR

Provided and run by:
Teesside Newmedica Limited

Important: We are carrying out a review of quality at Newmedica Community Ophthalmology Service. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

All Inspections

12 July 2022

During a routine inspection

This report describes our judgement of the quality of care at this service. It is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information given to us from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Key services were available seven days a week.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.
  • We also undertook a follow-up inspection for surgery services. We inspected surgery services in March 2022 and told Newmedica Teesside that the service must ensure the expiry dates of emergency medicines were checked in accordance with the provider’s policy and these medicines were replaced before the expiry date was reached. We told the service that they must ensure all bank staff had completed mandatory training and safeguarding training, so they had the necessary skills to carry out their role. We found that these areas had improved.

02 March 2022

During a routine inspection

Our rating of this location: We rated it as Good because:

  • Staff provided good care and treatment, and gave patients enough to eat and drink. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure most staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Most key services were available seven days a week.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • The service did not always use the systems and processes to safely manage medicines.
  • The service provided mandatory training in key skills and safeguarding training, but did not make sure everyone, for example, bank staff, completed it.
  • Not all staff knew who the safeguarding lead was.
  • Laser safety audits were not completed annually in accordance with corporate policy.
  • The provider was unable to evidence all bank staff without a substantive NHS role received an annual appraisal, in accordance with the provider’s policy.
  • We observed eye drops instilled before the correct side of surgery was marked. This was not in accordance with national best practice guidance.