• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Henley Medical Aesthetics

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

York Road,, Henley-on-thames, RG9 2DR

Provided and run by:
Henley Medical Aesthetics Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Henley Medical Aesthetics on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Henley Medical Aesthetics, you can give feedback on this service.

24 November 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Henley Medical Aesthetics. The reason for the inspection was because our current inspection priorities include services that have been registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) for over 12 months without being inspected. Henley Medical Aesthetics met these priorities because it registered with on 26 July 2019 and the provider had not been inspected.

Henley Medical Aesthetics provides a range of medical aesthetic treatments which include minor surgical procedures and treatment of hyperhidrosis (excess sweating). The service also provides private immunisations and treatments which are not available to patients on the NHS, for example ear microsuction. These services are offered via doctor and nurse led clinics. The service also offers other non-regulated aesthetic treatments.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Henley Medical Aesthetics provides a range of non-surgical cosmetic interventions, for example dermatological skin care treatments and anti-ageing injectables, which are not within CQC scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services.

Henley Medical Aesthetics is registered with CQC to provide the following regulated activities:

  • Treatment of disease, disorder or injury.
  • Diagnostic and screening procedures.
  • Surgical procedures.

One of the clinical leads is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • There were clear processes and systems to keep patients safe and safeguarded from abuse.
  • Systems and processes existed to monitor, detect and reduce the risk of infection.
  • Staff were clear about their roles and responsibilities and explained what they would do if a patient’s condition was not suitable for treatment by the service.
  • Clinical records were written clearly, stored securely and contained accurate information which enabled clinicians to deliver high quality care.
  • Clinicians had access to peer support from other healthcare settings which helped ensure they remained up to date with current best practice.
  • Evidence-based best practice guidance was followed when providing treatment to patients.
  • There was a chaperone policy and all staff had completed training and received a disclosure and barring service check before carrying out the role.
  • Staff understood the legislation around gaining consent to treatment from patients and we found this was documented in all the clinical records we reviewed.
  • The provider shared premises and staff with a co-located service (a NHS GP practice) and had adopted the governance arrangements of that service. Systems, policies and procedures therefore existed but were not specific to the provider.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Formalise the process for confirming parental authority for adults accompanying children at the service.
  • Review the process for notifying patients’ NHS GP practices about treatment.
  • Revise the governance systems, processes and policies to make sure any issues, risks or actions directly related to the service are fully considered, risk assessed and documented.
  • Revise the complaints process & associated information so patients have access to the necessary information they may need should they wish to make or escalate a complaint.
  • Increase audit activity and use the findings to drive improvements in the quality of services for patients.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services