• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Kinetic Nursing Services

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Unit 11, Ashley Business Court, Rawmarsh Road, Rotherham, S60 1RU (01709) 839395

Provided and run by:
Kinetic Nursing Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 8 December 2025 – 8 January 2026. Kinetic Nursing Services is a care at home service providing personal care and support to adults of all ages some of whom were living with dementia, physical disabilities and learning disabilities. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment there were 123 people receiving care and support. We inspected the service because of the length of the time since our last inspection. We reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The outcome of this assessment was a rating for the service.

The service supported people with a learning disability and autistic people. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities most people take for granted. We were assured the service provided safe and effective care and support for people with a learning disability and autistic people.

The provider had a positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Staff listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. The provider shared concerns quickly and appropriately and there were appropriate policies, systems and processes in place to keep people safe. Members of staff provided care to meet people’s needs which was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things which mattered to them. Care plans were person-centred and risk assessments were completed appropriately which ensured care was delivered in line with care plans. The provider made sure there were always enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received support, supervision and strong development opportunities. They worked together well to provide safe care which met people’s individual needs. The provider made sure medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.

The provider made sure people’s care and treatment was effective by assessing and reviewing their health, care, wellbeing and communication needs with them. The provider had developed good working relationships with local health and care professionals which supported joined up work and improved outcomes for people. Members of staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. The provider told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment. People were supported to give consent about their care and support and members of staff kept people informed about care and choice options.

The provider treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. The provider treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. People were supported to live independent lives and make decisions about their care and support. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to deliver person-centred care.

The provider made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs. The provider had a good understanding of the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. The provider enabled people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. Members of staff involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. Members of staff and leaders listened to information about people who are most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes. People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.

The provider had a clear shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and an understanding of the challenges and the needs of people and their communities. The provider had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They had an inclusive and fair culture which had improved equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. The provider focussed on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They always encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people.

10 June 2021

During a routine inspection

About the service:

Kinetic Nursing Services is a domiciliary care agency providing care and support to people in their own homes in the community. The service provides help with people's personal care needs in Rotherham and surrounding areas. At the time of the inspection they were providing personal care for 128 people.

People’s experience of using this service:

People and relatives we spoke with told us staff were excellent and made them feel safe. Staff understood safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures. We found adequate staff were employed to meet people’s needs. The recruitment process was robust to ensure only staff suitable to work with vulnerable adults were employed. The registered manager promoted a focus on openness and transparency. This ensured staff learned when things went wrong. Accidents and incidents were monitored to enable positive risk taking. People were protected by the prevention and control of infection. Medication systems were in place and followed by staff to ensure people received their medicines as prescribed. Improved documentation was implemented at the time of our inspection.

Staff were extremely knowledgeable about people needs, people told us the care provided was person-centred and individualised. Staff said training was good and kept their knowledge up to date. Staff were supervised and supported. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People who required support with meals were supported to be able to receive a balanced diet. People had access to health care professionals, staff worked closely with professionals to ensure people's needs were met. Professionals we spoke with told us the care provided was excellent.

People told us the staff were kind and caring. People were involved in their care planning to ensure their decisions and choices were reflected. Most people told us they were supported by the same group of staff, which ensured consistency. People told us staff were flexible and their care was consistently delivered to meet their needs and choices. People received care that was responsive to their needs. Staff understood people’s needs, including social, cultural, values and beliefs.

People were supported at the end of their life. The agency worked closely with health care professionals and provided outstanding end of life care. The staff ensured people and their families wishes were explored and plans developed so these were met. Staff were extremely passionate to ensure all people's needs were met and wanted to provide the highest possible quality of care including supporting family members.

There was a robust quality monitoring system in place to ensure continued improvements.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection:

This service changed registration details with us on 24 July 2019 and this is the first inspection since. The last rating for the service under the previous registration was good, published in 2017.

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection based on the date of registration.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Follow Up:

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.