• Care Home
  • Care home

Bishopsteignton House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Forder Lane, Bishopsteignton, Teignmouth, TQ14 9SE (01626) 770383

Provided and run by:
BishopshouseRCG LTD

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

11 May 2022

During a routine inspection

About the service

Bishopsteignton House is a residential care home that provides personal care for up to 27 people aged 65 and over. There were 27 people living there at the time of the inspection, although one person was admitted to hospital during the inspection. Bishopsteignton House is set in its own grounds with bright spacious communal areas.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Despite national staffing shortages, the management team had worked hard to ensure they recruited new staff. Newly recruited staff were positive about the supportive environment created by the registered manager and the good teamwork. For example, “There is a lovely atmosphere, a strong team and supporting management.”

People generally received their medicines in the way prescribed for them. However, there were improvements needed to some aspects of the way people’s medicines were managed.

Staff relationships with people were caring and supportive. People commented staff were busy and would like them to have more time to stop and talk but praised their kindness and attentiveness. One person summed up their experience, saying “Overall, we are blessed” and another said, “The staff are miraculous, can’t do enough for me.” Visitors were also positive, for example staff “genuinely so caring and gentle.”

Recruitment checks helped ensure staff were suitable to support people. People received effective care and support from staff who were well trained and competent. Staff described their training as “comprehensive.”

The service provided safe care to people. People were relaxed with one another and the staff group. People commented on the importance of companionship and their friendships within the home. Visitors said they were reassured by their relative’s appearance and contentment. For example. “I would arrive unexpectedly and find mum clean, calm and well looked after.”

Measures to manage risk were as least restrictive as possible to protect people's freedom. People's rights were protected because the service followed the appropriate legal processes.

Care files were personalised to reflect people's personal preferences. People’s views and suggestions were provided with the opportunity to feedback on their experience, which was taken into account to improve the service. People were supported to maintain a balanced diet with a weekly menu and choices. Health and social care professionals were regularly involved in people's care to ensure they received the care and treatment which was right for them.

Visitors and people living at the home commented on the cleanliness and the well-maintained environment. Staff followed current hygiene practice to reduce the risk of infections. Visitors to the service were given information to help them reduce the risk of catching and spreading infection. Health and safety checks of the premises and equipment were carried out at regular intervals.

Staff spoke positively about good communication and how the management team worked well with them and encouraged their professional development.

People's equality, diversity and human rights were respected. During the inspection, work was undertaken to ensure processes and information were more person centred and easy to access. The registered manager and the staff team worked with a shared purpose putting people’s well-being at the heart of their practice.

A number of methods were used to assess the quality and safety of the service people received. The service made continuous improvements in response to their findings.

During this inspection we carried out a separate thematic probe, which asked questions of the provider, people and their relatives, about the quality of oral health care support and access to dentists, for people living in the care home. This was to follow up on the findings and recommendations from our national report on oral healthcare in care homes that was published in 2019 called ‘Smiling Matters’. We will publish a follow up report to the 2019 'Smiling Matters' report, with up to date findings and recommendations about oral health, in due course.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 18 September 2019 and this is their first inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

You can read the report from our inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Bishopsteignton House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

1 February 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Bishopsteignton House is a care home registered for upto 27 people. There were 23 people living there on the day of inspection. Accomodation is situated over two floors with spacious communal areas on the ground floor.

We found the following examples of good practice.

The staff carried out regular ‘Covid drills’. This involved the use of glitter to visibly demonstrate how virus particles can spread and where ‘hot spots’ are situated.

The home had successfully implemented their contingency plan to contain an outbreak in June 2020. This included moving people to an isolation zone and co-horting staff to restrict the spread of infection.

Systems were in place to regularly check people for any new symptoms of Covid-19. This included checking peoples temperatures and assessing people for 'soft' signs and any changes in their wellbeing.

Staff had completed training including training provided by the Local Authority regarding the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Staff were observed to be using the appropriate PPE for the task they were completing and were wearing it correctly.