• Ambulance service

32 Nobel Square Also known as Specialist Medical Transport Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

32 Nobel Square, Burnt Mills Industrial Estate, Basildon, SS13 1LT 07801 744623

Provided and run by:
Specialist Medical Transport Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment of Emergency and urgent care

Specialist Medical Transport provides emergency and urgent care and patient transport services. This includes the transportation of children and people with mental health concerns. During this assessment we looked at both emergency and urgent care and patient transport services provided at the Basildon and Devon sites.

Our inspection was prompted by concerns relating to medicines management, equipment, vehicle safety, staff training, and infection control. Key issues included service user care problems, workplace bullying, operational safety lapses, data breaches, and regulatory non-compliance.

The location was rated Good at this assessment. In our assessment we found the following areas of good practice:

There was a learning culture where concerns were promptly investigated by managers. People were kept safe, with staff effectively managing risks. Facilities and equipment were clean and well-maintained. There were enough skilled staff, who received regular training and appraisals. Medicines were managed well.

People were treated with kindness and compassion, their privacy and dignity were protected, and staff supported their preferences. Leaders and staff shared a vision based on listening, learning, and trust. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally. Managers worked with the community to deliver the best care and fostered a culture of continuous improvement.

During an assessment of Emergency and urgent care

Specialist Medical Transport provides emergency and urgent care and patient transport services. This includes the transportation of children and people with mental health concerns. During this assessment we looked at both emergency and urgent care and patient transport services provided at the Basildon and Devon sites.

Our inspection was prompted by concerns relating to medicines management, equipment, vehicle safety, staff training, and infection control. Key issues included service user care problems, workplace bullying, operational safety lapses, data breaches, and regulatory non-compliance.

The location was rated Good at this assessment. In our assessment we found the following areas of good practice:

There was a learning culture where concerns were promptly investigated by managers. People were kept safe, with staff effectively managing risks. Facilities and equipment were clean and well-maintained. There were enough skilled staff, who received regular training and appraisals. Medicines were managed well.

People were treated with kindness and compassion, their privacy and dignity were protected, and staff supported their preferences. Leaders and staff shared a vision based on listening, learning, and trust. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally. Managers worked with the community to deliver the best care and fostered a culture of continuous improvement.

During an assessment of the hospital overall

Specialist Medical Transport provides emergency and urgent care and patient transport services. This includes the transportation of children and people with mental health concerns. During this assessment we looked at both emergency and urgent care and patient transport services provided at the Basildon and Devon sites.

Our inspection was prompted by concerns relating to medicines management, equipment, vehicle safety, staff training, and infection control. Key issues included service user care problems, workplace bullying, operational safety lapses, data breaches, and regulatory non-compliance. 

The location was rated Good at this assessment. In our assessment we found the following areas of good practice: 

There was a learning culture where concerns were promptly investigated by managers. People were kept safe, with staff effectively managing risks. Facilities and equipment were clean and well-maintained. There were enough skilled staff, who received regular training and appraisals. Medicines were managed well. 

People were treated with kindness and compassion, their privacy and dignity were protected, and staff supported their preferences. Leaders and staff shared a vision based on listening, learning, and trust. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally. Managers worked with the community to deliver the best care and fostered a culture of continuous improvement.

 

12 January 2022

During a routine inspection

We rated the service as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills and understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients who used the service, acted on them and mostly kept appropriate records.
  • Staff provided good care. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients. Services were available seven days a week.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients and other involved in their care.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff felt respected, supported, and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and were committed to improving services.
  • Managers had a formal risk register in place and contingency management plans to manage risks.
  • Recruitment processes were standardised, appropriately processed and all relevant documentation in individual staff files to ensure staff suitability was clearly evidenced.
  • Policies were available and completed, annually reviewed and provided with all detail required to guide staff using up to date procedures.

However:

  • The service did not have a documented appraisal and supervision system for staff development.
  • Staff did not always ensure risk records were up to date and comprehensively completed.