• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

ASET Hospital

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

1 Sandstone Drive, Whiston, Prescot, L35 7LS (0151) 426 4777

Provided and run by:
ASET Hospital Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 17 February 2023

ASET Hospital is a registered location of Hasaan Shaaban Limited. The provider has been registered since 2019 to provide the regulated activities Treatment of Disease Disorder or Injury, and Surgery. The service provides a range of surgical and non-surgical cosmetic procedures for private patients. The service also had arrangements with several third-party providers for provision of different services, these being mainly theatre services and related staffing support. The service did not treat any patients under 18 years old.

This was the first inspection since the provider’s registration in August 2019.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 17 February 2023

We rated this service as requires improvement because:

  • Staff had not always completed training in key skills and safeguarding training completion rates were low. Staff had a basic understanding of how to protect patients from abuse. Staff did not always manage medicines well. Staff did not always record key information in care records. The service mostly controlled infection risk although one treatment room had visible damp on the wall.
  • The service did not always take account of patients’ individual needs and arrangements for patients who required interpreter or communication support were limited. There was a lack of information provided for patients about how to raise a concern or a complaint to the service.
  • Staff did not always understand the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. The service did not always promote equality and diversity in daily work. Leaders did not always operate effective governance processes throughout the service or manage risks in the service. There was limited engagement with patients and the community.

However:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe and had systems to manage safety. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Key services were available seven days a week.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders used information systems to run the service and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. Staff were committed to providing a quality experience for patients.

We rated this service as requires improvement because it was effective, caring and responsive, although safe and leadership requires improvement.

Outpatients

Requires improvement

Updated 17 February 2023

Outpatients is a small proportion of hospital activity. The main service was surgery. Where arrangements were the same, we have reported findings in the surgery section.

The service had two consultation rooms. One of these was also described as theatre room 2, but was used flexibly as a clinical treatment room and for consultations.

We rated this service as requires improvement because it was caring although safe, responsive and well led requires improvement. We inspected but do not rate the domain for effective.

We spoke with nine patients who had received outpatient care in the service.