• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

HW Homecare

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

10 Robertson Street, Hastings, TN34 1HL (01424) 237000

Provided and run by:
HW Homecare Ltd

All Inspections

30 May 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

HW Homecare is a domiciliary care agency. At the time of our inspection, they provided personal care to 9 people living in their own homes. It provided a service to older adults, some who required moving and handling support or to manage health conditions.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Although a person and relatives told us they felt people were safe, we found risks to people were not always identified or recorded to ensure people’s safety. Staff did not always demonstrate knowledge of how to recognise concerns or report them to appropriate others. We received mixed feedback about the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) used by staff and staff competency had not been assessed in this area. Medicines had not always been given safely and there were no contingency plans for an emergency event. Staff recruitment checks were not consistently made before employment.

We found areas for improvement regarding staff knowledge and training. Staff were not adequately supported in their roles. There was minimal staff supervision and checks to ensure training had been effective.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. However, we found staff did not always understand their legal responsibilities regarding documentation under the mental capacity act.

People's care documentation was not person-centred nor reflective of their current support needs. Where risks had been identified to people's health and wellbeing, assessments had not consistently been completed to detail support needs or when to seek further professional advice. There was a lack of oversight on incidents, complaints, training, medicines and safeguarding which meant the provider had not reflected on themes and trends. We also found that the provider had not always reported incidents to us that they were legally required to do.

The culture of the service was not always open and positive. Some feedback included unprofessional behaviour from staff, with reluctance to raise concerns or confusion on who to complain to. People, their relatives and staff had not been asked to provide feedback about their experiences of care.

People had assessments of need completed before they received support and involvement from professionals when required. A professional gave positive feedback about how staff worked with them to support a person.

Despite the concerns we found, a person and relatives were happy they received support from the same staff every day. The provider demonstrated a willingness to work with others and improve the service. The branch manager responded immediately to some areas of improvement during the inspection.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 24 February 2022). The service remains rated requires improvement.

Why we inspected

We received concerns in relation to poor governance and minimal improvements from the previous inspection. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of Safe and Well-led.

We inspected and found there was a concern with staff training and understanding of mental capacity, so we widened the scope of the inspection to become a focused inspection which included the key question of Effective.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

The overall rating for the service has remained Requires Improvement. However, the key question of effective has changed from Good to Requires Improvement based on the findings of this inspection.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the Safe, Effective and Well-led sections of this report.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for HW Homecare on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement

We have 4 identified breaches of regulations in relation to risk management, staff recruitment, staff training and leadership at this inspection.

We identified concerns about staff knowledge of mental capacity. We have made a recommendation regarding this.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

31 January 2022

During a routine inspection

About the service

HW Homecare is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care. The service provides support to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were five people using the service. The registered manager was planning to take on more people’s packages of care to expand the service.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Although people and their relatives told us they felt people were supported safely, risks to people were not always identified and assessed in their care documentation. This meant that there was a risk new staff would not have the guidance to show how to support people. Emergency planning had also not been considered for events such as adverse weather conditions or staff sickness. The registered manager recognised these as areas for improvement and started implementing risk assessments during the inspection.

We found improvements were needed to people's care documentation to ensure their current support needs and preferences were reflected accurately. Staff knew people well and so this had minimal impact on people. Other improvements were required to the recording of staff information. Although we found improvements were needed to records, people, their relatives and staff were positive about the registered manager and felt the service was well led. One staff member said, “When I started, I was so nervous and they guided me through it all. They and the care coordinator are amazing and have taught me a lot.”

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff received a thorough induction and training programme to ensure they had the skills and knowledge to meet people’s needs.

People, their relatives and a professional were unanimous in their view that staff were kind and caring. They told us people’s privacy, dignity and independence were respected and promoted at all times.

Because staff knew people so well, they provided personalised care that met people’s needs and preferences. Although no complaints had been received, people told us their views were always listened to and they knew what to do if they had concerns.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

This is the service’s first inspection since their registration in July 2021.

Why we inspected

This was a planned comprehensive inspection, following the registration of the location.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.