• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

86 Harley Street

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

86 Harley Street, London, W1G 7HP (020) 7224 529

Provided and run by:
The Wimpole Street Clinic for Women Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about 86 Harley Street on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about 86 Harley Street, you can give feedback on this service.

22 June 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at 86 Harley Street, London on 22 June 2022. This inspection was undertaken as part of our programme of inspecting independent doctor services registered with the commission. This inspection was the first rated inspection following registration with the commission.

The clinic offers a range of gynaecological services covering the full life of a women’s sexual health, from early conversations about contraception to pregnancy and fertility advice, menopause and ongoing sexual health.

Jeffery Braithwaite was the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse.
  • The service had systems and processes in place to mitigate any risks to health and safety.
  • Individual care records were written and managed in a way that kept patients safe. The care records we saw showed that information needed to deliver safe care and treatment was available to relevant staff in an accessible way.
  • The service had a safe system in place for the management of medicines.
  • The service acted on and learned from external safety and significant events .
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Regular checks on the defibrillator which is located on the third floor of the building and currently checked by another service. The provider should maintain their own individual checks on a regular basis.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

18 December 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 18 December 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

The Wimpole Street Clinic for Women Ltd is an independent health service based in Westminster, where gynaecology consultations for woman aged 18 years and above took place.’

Our key findings were:

  • Systems were in place to keep patients safe and safeguarded from abuse.
  • There were systems to keep the provider up to date with evidence based practice.
  • Medicines were managed and monitored in a way that kept patients safe.
  • There was a programme of quality improvement activities.
  • All members of staff were up-to-date with training relevant to their role.
  • There were comprehensive risk assessments to mitigate current and future risks.
  • Systems were in place to protect the personal information of patients.
  • Policies and procedures were in place to govern activity.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice