• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Woodhall Support Services Ltd

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

2 Haygate Road, Wellington, Telford, TF1 1QA (01952) 373000

Provided and run by:
Woodhall Support Services Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 28 November 2025, 14, 15 and 16 January 2026. Woodhall Support Services Ltd is a domiciliary care service that provides care and support to people living in their own home.

During this assessment, we reviewed the quality statements Safe and Well-Led. We found the registered provider was in breach of 2 regulations relating to safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment and good governance.

Discussions with the registered manager, alongside a review of records, confirmed potential safeguarding concerns had not been referred to the appropriate agencies to ensure people’s safety.

Care records did not contain the necessary information to support staff understanding about how to provide appropriate care. For example, dementia and oral care plans were not in place. Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) were missing, which meant there was no clear guidance to ensure safe evacuation in the event of an emergency. In addition, for medicines prescribed as Pro Re Nata (PRN), there were no protocols in place to support the safe and consistent administration of these medicines.

A review of the provider’s governance arrangements was required to ensure effective oversight of the service and to address the shortfalls identified during this assessment.

Risk assessments were in place to promote people’s independence whilst ensuring their safety. Incidents had not been referred to the appropriate agencies. Action had been taken by the registered manager to reduce the risk of further recurrence.

At the time of our assessment, the service was providing care to people with a learning disability and autistic people. However, the registered provider was not registered for this service user band. Although, staff had received training within this area. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Since the site visit, we have received an application to add the service user band for learning disability and autism and an updated Statement of Purpose.

21 February 2020

During a routine inspection

About the service

Woodhall Support Services is a domiciliary care agency. They provide assistance with personal care to people living in their own home. At the time of inspection, they were supporting 13 people, five of whom received support with personal care.

Not everyone who used the service received support with personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider had not consistently applied their recruitment procedures due to pre-existing knowledge of some of the staff employed. The provider took immediate action and all the information was in place before the inspection activity concluded.

People felt safe with the care received. Risks to people’s safety were considered on a day to day basis and in the event of adverse situations, such as bad weather.

People received their medicine on time by staff who had received training in the safe administration of medicine. People were protected from the risk of infection by staff who all had access to adequate personal and protective equipment.

Accident and incident forms were reviewed to ensure any necessary lessons were learnt and shared with the rest of the team.

People’s care needs were assessed, and care plans were devised which contained all the necessary information. People had access to healthcare, support with maintaining a balanced diet and, in maintaining contact with other agencies who were involved.

Staff received training to support them in their role and staff felt they had sufficient knowledge to fulfil their role.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were well treated. Their views were encouraged and their right to privacy was respected.

People’s care plans were personalised to their individual needs and people received care and support at a time that suited them. People’s communication needs were considered at all times.

People were supported to access their community and we received positive feedback regarding the companionship offered.

People knew how to raise a complaint and the provider had a process in place to ensure all concerns raised were investigated and feedback was provided.

The provider was not supporting anyone with end of life care at the time of inspection but were looking to increase the staff training in this area.

People were complimentary about the service and staff felt they were supporting people to achieve positive outcomes. The provider monitored the quality of the care being delivered and were aware of their duty of candour.

The provider worked with others and could demonstrate continuous learning and engagement with staff and the people they supported.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 27 February 2019 and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the date the service first registered with us.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.