• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Immaculate Health Care Services Limited - Croydon

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Lombard House, 2 Purley Way, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 3JP (020) 8665 1777

Provided and run by:
Immaculate Healthcare Services Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

29 and 30 June and 6 July 2015

During a routine inspection

Immaculate Healthcare Limited is a domiciliary care agency which provides care and support to enable people remain independent in their own homes in the London Borough of Croydon.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We last inspected Immaculate Healthcare Services Limited in June 2014. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all the regulations that we assessed.

People spoke positively about the service provided, and found there were sustained improvements in how this was delivered in the past twelve months. They told us that they usually had regular care staff who were familiar to them, and that this was important to them. They told us they were able to build up a trusting relationship with staff.

People were kept safe and free from harm. There were appropriate numbers of staff employed to meet people’s needs and to provide a flexible service. Staffing numbers were able to respond flexibly to accommodate last minute changes to appointments as requested by the person who used the service or their relatives.

People’s needs were assessed, and care plans and risk assessments were completed with everyone who was receiving a service, and this ensured people had their needs were met and helped protect them from the risk of harm.

People said they were involved in their care planning and were happy to express their views or raise concerns. When people’s needs changed, staff promptly identified this and addressed it appropriately through updated care plans and revised care arrangements. Staff took appropriate action to ensure people’s well-being was protected.

People told us that staff sought their consent before they provided care. The registered manager and staff all had an understanding of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and care records reflected this.

Care staff received training and support through induction, and a programme of training, supervision and appraisal. Staff assigned to care for people in their own homes understood the support that people needed and were given sufficient time to provide the service needed in a safe and dignified way.

People were asked for their views on the service provided, there were systems in place to monitor and assess the quality of care provided and drive improvements in the service.

Staff completed daily records in people’s homes to record what care treatment and support had been provided. People found that care staff listened to them, acted on what they said, delivered support in a way they liked and a time to suit them.

The service had quality assurance processes in place which helped drive improvements in the service. Checks were carried out to people’s homes to make sure care staff were working in accordance with people’s plan of care and to make sure people received the care they required.

17 June 2014

During a routine inspection

An adult social care inspector carried out this inspection. During the inspection we worked to answer five key questions; is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led? Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, looking at records and speaking with eight people using the service, their relatives and five members of staff including the registered manager.

Please read the full report for evidence that supports our summary.

Is the service safe?

We looked at a random selection of care plans for people using the service. We saw that they covered a range of care and healthcare needs including risk assessments and were regularly reviewed.

We found that there were procedures to deal with foreseeable emergencies. People using the service could contact the service 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

We saw there were procedures in place for recording the prompting of medication where necessary however these records were not suitable if carers were to administer people's medicines.

Recruitment practice was safe and thorough. The provider could demonstrate that that the staff employed to work at the service were suitable and had the skills and experience needed to support the people using the service.

There were regular spot checks on staff whilst they were delivering care in people's homes.

Is the service effective?

Peoples care needs had been assessed and care plans were in place. Although the initial assessment of care was person centred we saw the services care planning was not always personalised to meet individual needs.

We spoke with people who used the service and their relatives who told us carers would talk to them about the care they were about to give. One person told us, 'the staff speak nicely to me and tell me what they want to do.' Another person said, 'they tell me what they are going to do but sometimes they seem in a hurry so we don't get to talk much.' A relative told us, 'They seem to treat [my relative] with respect and will talk through the care they are giving.'

We spoke to carers who told us they asked people for their consent before they started delivering care and support. One carer told us, "the training we get tells us we need to explain things to people.' Another carer said, "I explain to clients what I am there for and if they are happy I will begin care.'

Is the service caring?

We spoke with eight people using the service and / or their relatives. We asked them for their opinions about the service and the staff that supported them. Their comments included, 'the carers are good, I have no complaints', 'they are normally on time, they stay for as long as they need to and do what they need to do', 'overall they are OK' and 'I am happy enough with them.'

Is the service responsive?

People knew how to make a complaint if they were unhappy. Everyone we spoke with told us if they had any issues they would speak with their carer or with the manager. One person told us, "they do try hard, they are very professional.' Another person said, 'the office is OK if they provide a replacement they ring and tell me.'

Is the service well led?

Information from the analysis of resident's surveys had been used to identify any areas for improvement.

There were systems in place to make sure the staff learnt from events such as accidents and incidents. These meant risks to people were reduced and there was evidence that the registered manager used this to improve and develop the service.

4 April 2013

During a routine inspection

Immaculate Health Care in Croydon is registered to provide personal care for people in their own homes. We undertook a planned inspection of the service although we had previously been made aware of some concerns. These had been about the pre-employment checks being made on the people who were working for the service. When we visited a new manager had now been appointed and measures had been introduced to ensure the issues of concern were addressed.

We were able to speak with six of the people currently receiving support from the service. They all confirmed that they were happy with the service they received. They told us that staff were, 'kind', 'really good', and 'capable'. One person said 'I couldn't rate them anymore highly'. They had been given information about how to contact the service, if they needed to, and said that any concerns were addressed promptly.

Although we judged the service to be compliant at the time of our visit we will continue to monitor them to ensure that the improvements are maintained.