Background to this inspection
Updated
2 November 2019
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by two inspectors.
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. The registered manager was also the provider. This means they are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and Healthwatch. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England.
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.
We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with five people who used the service and two relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with twelve members of staff including the registered manager, care coordinator, field care coordinators, office manager, system administrator and four care staff. We spoke with a consultant who was working with the service.
We reviewed a range of records. This included three people’s care records. We also examined records in relation to the management of the service such as staff recruitment files, quality assurance checks, staff training records, policies and procedures, safeguarding information and accidents and incident information.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at staff meeting records and policies and procedures.
Updated
2 November 2019
About the service
Concept Care Solutions (Northampton) is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of inspection 33 people were receiving personal care.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People continued to be cared for safely. Risk assessments were in place and reviewed regularly and as needs changed. Staff understood safeguarding procedures. Safe recruitment practices were followed to ensure staff were suitable for their roles.
There were enough staff to meet people’s care needs and people usually received care at the agreed times. People were supported with their medicines and good infection control practices were in place.
People’s care records contained clear information covering all aspects of their care and support needs. Staff had a good understanding of people’s wishes and individual preferences. People’s personal histories, preferences and dislikes, diversity needs such as cultural or religious needs and links with family were all considered within the care plans. Staff received training to meet people’s needs.
Where required, people were supported with their eating and drinking to ensure their dietary requirements were met. People were supported to access health care services when needed.
People received support from reliable, compassionate staff. Staff enjoyed working at the service and there was good communication and team work. Staff were caring in their approach and had good relationships with people and their relatives. People were treated with respect. Staff maintained people’s dignity and promoted their independence. Consent was sought before care was delivered.
The registered manager was also the provider and they monitored the quality of the service provided, along with the management team. They were aware of their legal responsibilities and worked in an open and transparent way. People and their relatives knew how to make a complaint.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
The last rating for this service was good (published 17 August 2018).
This was a planned inspection which took place sooner than usual due to changes being made to the location address on the computer system. This meant the inspection date was brought forward.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per out re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.