• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Old Road, Elham, Canterbury, CT4 6UH (01303) 840213

Provided and run by:
The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

07 September 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice on 6 and 7 September 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring – Not inspected

Responsive – Not inspected

Well-led - Good

Following our previous inspection on 29 July 2021, the practice was rated Requires Improvement overall and for safe, effective and well led. The practice was rated good for caring and responsive.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • Responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management were clear.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.

information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations

We have rated this practice as Good overall.

We found that:

  • Patients’ needs were assessed, and care and treatment was delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.
  • The practice’s processes for managing risks, issues and performance were effective.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

29 July 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice on 29 July 2021.

Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe - Requires Improvement

Are services effective - Requires Improvement

Are services well-led - Requires Improvement

Following our previous inspection on 17 December 2019, the practice was rated Requires Improvement overall and for safe, effective and well led. The practice was rated good for caring and responsive.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive review of information conducted remotely whilst also undertaking a site visit inspection to follow up on:

Performance of the practice in safe, effective and well led domains. In particular, we inspected the management of medicine alerts, and effective systems and processes to help ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall and for people with long-term conditions and Good for all of the other population groups.

We found that:

  • The provider had made improvements to the management and records of staff vaccination statuses.
  • Appropriate standards of cleanliness and hygiene were met.
  • The arrangements for managing medicines did not always keep patients safe.
  • The provider had made some improvements to the management of safety alerts. However, further improvements were required.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed, but care and treatment were not always delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.
  • The pandemic had had a detrimental effect on the practice’s ability to deliver some care as well as treatment. However, improvements were required in the record keeping for some types of patient reviews as well as subsequent follow up activities.
  • The practice had met the WHO based national target of 95% for all five of the childhood immunisation uptake indicators.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles. However, improvements to the recording of staff competency and the quality of their clinical records were required.
  • There was compassionate as well as inclusive leadership at all levels and the practice had a vision to deliver high-quality care and promote good outcomes for patients.
  • The practice’s processes for managing risks, issues and performance were not always effective.
  • The practice had systems to continue to deliver services and meet patients’ needs during the pandemic.
  • There were systems and processes for learning, continuous improvement and innovation.

We found two breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Consider revising the recruitment policy to reflect the current practice of accepting staff Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks from previous employers.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

17/12/2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Hawkinge & Elham Valley Practice on 17 December 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services because:

  • Records of staff vaccinations were not up to date.
  • There was no mechanism to ensure that safety alerts had been correctly responded to.

We rated the practice as good for providing effective services because:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.

We rated the practice as good for providing caring services because:

  • Staff treated patients with kindness, respect and compassion.
  • Feedback from patients was positive about the way staff treated people and helped them to be involved in decisions about care and treatment.

We rated the practice as good for providing responsive services because:

  • Services were tailored to meet the needs of individual patients. They were delivered in a flexible way that ensured choice and continuity of care.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing well-led services because:

  • Responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management were not always clear.
  • Processes for managing risks, issues and performance were not always effective.

and

  • The records of staff vaccinations were not up to date.
  • The governance of safety alerts was not effective

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Identify and implement actions to reduce exception reporting for alcohol consumption for patients on the mental health register.
  • Review the prescribing of hypnotic medicines to identify appropriate actions to bring about a reduction in prescribing, as appropriate.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care