• Care Home
  • Care home

Ashbury Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

124-128, Aldwick Road, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, PO21 2PA (01243) 824689

Provided and run by:
Ashton Care (Bognor Regis) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Our view of the service

About the service

Ashbury Care Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 29 people. At the time of this assessment there were 29 people using the service.

Who the service is for

The service supports older people, including people living with dementia, mental health needs and people with learning disabilities.

We carried out this assessment on 18 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found that the provider was working to this guidance.

People were supported in a service where safety remained a priority. Risks to people were assessed and managed in a way that balanced safety with independence and choice. Staffing levels were reviewed in line with people's needs and staff received training and support to carry out their roles safely. The provider had systems to learn from incidents, complaints and feedback and used this information to improve practice. Medicines were reviewed regularly with healthcare professionals and people were protected through safeguarding processes and partnership working with external agencies.

People received care from staff who understood their individual needs and preferences. Communication needs were assessed and supported through a range of accessible formats, assistive tools and personalised approaches. Staff worked collaboratively with healthcare professionals including GPs, community nursing teams, speech and language therapists, mental health services and learning disability teams to support people's health and wellbeing.

There was a caring culture throughout the home. People were supported to make choices, maintain relationships and participate in activities that were meaningful to them. Staff respected people's protected characteristics, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs and personal preferences. The provider promoted dignity, autonomy and individual choice in day-to-day care.

Care was personalised and responsive to changes in people's needs. People received information in formats that met their communication needs and were encouraged to provide feedback about their experiences. The provider demonstrated a commitment to ensuring people had equitable access to care, support, activities and community opportunities.

Leaders had established governance systems to monitor quality and safety and promote continuous improvement. There was an open culture where learning, staff development and innovation were encouraged. The provider demonstrated a commitment to workforce wellbeing, inclusion and equality and worked collaboratively with external partners to improve outcomes for people.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. One professional described senior leaders as, "proactive", while another said they were, "Always wanting the best for people at Ashbury. They encourage people to live their own lives as they wish and if it involves risk, they handle that really well.”

12 March 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service:

Ashbury is a 29-bedded care home without nursing providing 24-hour care for people with mental health needs that include schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder. The home also provides support to people who may have a learning disability. The home is situated in Bognor Regis. At the time of our inspection there were 29 people living at the home.

Ashbury has 29 ensuite bedrooms located over two floors which are accessible via stairs or lift shafts. The home had two large communal areas and a garden at the rear of the home.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk.

People’s experience of using this service:

•People and relatives told us they felt the home was a safe place to be and felt comfortable to raise concerns with staff. One person told us, “The care and attention is the best thing about here.”

•People were supported to live as independently as possible and told us that their needs were met. Activities took place on a daily basis and people were encouraged to participate if they wanted to. One person told us, “The best thing is it’s very sociable here”. Another person said, I do feel I get what I need here and the activities are not bad. I get to go out with a carer sometimes.”

•Relatives and visitors were welcomed to visit people and given the privacy to talk. One relative told us, “The communication is good, and I can ring the staff about anything anytime. We have always felt welcome here.”

•People and relatives told us that staff treated them with kindness and we observed friendly interactions throughout the day. One person told us, “Staff are marvellous and they are all so kind.”

•People were happy with the food and said they were given a choice of home cooked meals. One person told us, “The food is excellent and the chef is good.”

•People were supported by trained staff who were knowledgeable and knew how to care for people, in line with their needs and preferences.

•People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

•The provider had quality assurance systems in place to monitor the standard of care and

drive improvement. Systems supported people to stay safe and reduce the risks to them, ensuring they were cared for in a person-centred way.

•People, relatives and staff spoke positively about the culture of the home and said it was well managed. One person told us, “I do believe the place is well run.” Another person said, “Staff do work as a good unit, they seem quite happy”

More information is in Detailed Findings below.

Rating at last inspection: Good (Following the previous inspection on 16 May 2016 the provider changed its registration to a Limited Company.) The provider registered the new service with the CQC on 6 December 2018.

Why we inspected: This was a scheduled inspection

Follow up: We will continue to monitor the intelligence we receive about this home and plan to inspect in line with our re-inspection schedule for those services rated Good.