• Community
  • Community healthcare service

Gray Healthcare

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2000 Vortex Court, Enterprise Way, Liverpool, Merseyside, L13 1FB (0151) 255 2830

Provided and run by:
Gray Healthcare Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

7, 8, 13, 14 October and 12 November 2021

During a routine inspection

Gray Healthcare provides home based rehabilitation and recovery focused support for adults of working age with severe and enduring mental health needs, autistic spectrum disorder, learning disability, or an acquired brain injury, who may have additionally complex health care needs, which increases their vulnerability.

Our rating of this location stayed the same. We rated it as good because:

The service made sure client’s homes were safe and clean. The service had enough staff. Staff assessed and managed risk well and followed good practice with respect to safeguarding.

Staff developed person centred, recovery-oriented care plans which focused on the whole picture of clients’ needs. They provided a range of treatments suitable to clients’ needs and in line with national guidance about best practice. Staff engaged in clinical audit to evaluate the quality of care they provided. For example, health care monitoring of clients with long term health conditions and regular reviewing of positive behaviour support plans with clients and their families, This helped clients and their families to work with the provider support and clinical staff to discuss what was working well for the client and identify areas for growth and development.

The teams included or had access to the full range of specialists required to meet the needs of clients in their care. Managers made sure staff received training, supervision and appraisal. Staff worked well together as a bigger team and with relevant services outside the organisation.

Staff treated clients with compassion and kindness and understood their individual needs. They actively involved clients in decisions and care planning. Clients were truly respected and valued as individuals and were empowered as partners in their care, practically and emotionally, by an exceptionally caring service. Clients told us the service exceeded their expectations in terms of support from staff and finding them a suitable home. For example, involving clients in choosing their homes, furniture and decor and client’s able to have pets of their own and care for them.

Relationships between people who use the service, those close to them and staff were strong, caring, respectful and supportive. These relationships were highly valued by staff and promoted by leaders.

Services were tailored to meet the needs of individual clients and were delivered in a way to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care. For example, agreeing when clients would have unsupported hour from staff or when visiting families, and staff remained on call to support clients if needed.

Discharge from the service was well planned and coordinated with commissioners and other services so clients had alternative access to services whose needs it could not meet.

The service was well led with thorough leadership strategies in place to make sure a positive culture was developed. Objectives and plans were challenging and innovative, while remaining achievable.

The leadership team had a shared purpose and worked hard to deliver and motivate staff to succeed. Staff were proud of the organisation as a place to work and spoke highly of the culture.

The governance processes were proactively reviewed to make sure that its procedures ran smoothly.

11 to 27 Sept 2019

During a routine inspection

Gray Healthcare provides a home based rehabilitation and recovery focused support and care for adults with mental health conditions, learning disabilities, acquired brain injuries and complex needs. The service supports clients to develop their own recovery strategies to manage behaviour that can be challenging.

  • The service provided safe care in the premises where clients own homes. The service used safe systems and processes to ensure that staff were supported to work safely and to help clients to keep their premises safe and clean.
  • Staff assessed and managed risk well and followed good practice with respect to safeguarding. Staff developed holistic, recovery-oriented plans informed by a comprehensive assessment that focused on relapse prevention. They provided a range of support suitable to the needs of the clients and engaged in clinical audit to evaluate the quality of care they provided.
  • The teams included or had access to the full range of specialists required to meet the needs of the clients. Managers ensured that these staff received training, supervision and appraisal. Staff worked well together as a multidisciplinary team and with relevant services outside the organisation.
  • Staff treated clients with dignity, respect, compassion and kindness, and understood the individual needs of clients. There was a strong person-centred culture. Staff empowered clients to have a voice and realise their potential. Clients’ individual needs and preferences were reflected in the way care was delivered. Clients were supported to access local community facilities for leisure activities.
  • Clients were active partners in the delivery, review and development of their individual care packages. The service used clients’ feedback to inform service development. The service was well led, and the governance processes ensured that procedures relating to the work of the service ran smoothly.
  • There was compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership at all levels. Senior managers were a visible presence. There were clear vision and values embedded within the service. Effective governance processes ensured that managers had a clear overview of service performance. There was a commitment to service improvement and innovation. Staff reported that they felt valued, supported and were encouraged to develop their knowledge and skills. Morale was positive, and staff worked collaboratively within their team and with external agencies. There was an open culture and staff were able to raise concerns without fear of victimisation.