• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Because We Care Northampton

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

30 Brookfield Road, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN2 7LS 07398 785644

Provided and run by:
Because We Care Northampton Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Assessment date: 06 to 30 January 2026

Because We Care Northampton is a domiciliary care agency providing support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. At the time of inspection, 6 people were receiving personal care support.

This inspection was carried out to check whether the provider had made the required significant improvements identified at the last inspection.

Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staff recruitment, medicines management, consent and governance.

People and their relatives spoke positively about the kindness and attentiveness of the provider and staff. However, there continued to be widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership, governance, and the delivery of safe, effective care.

People continued to experience avoidable risks due to ineffective incident oversight, poor risk management, and unsafe medicines practices, including missed doses and inconsistent recording. Safeguarding processes were not robust, and leaders lacked the required knowledge to identify or act on concerns.

Care plans lacked detail, assessments were not routinely updated, and bestpractice guidance was not embedded. Decisions were made without appropriate professional oversight, and there continued to be no evidence of mental capacity assessments or lawful best interest processes.

Leadership remained ineffective and governance arrangements were not embedded. Systems to monitor quality, manage risks, or drive improvement were either absent or not followed. Engagement with staff, external partners, and the wider community was limited, and learning from incidents or previous inspections was not demonstrated.

The service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

During an assessment under our new approach

Assessment date: 10 to 23 June 2025. Because We Care Northampton is a domiciliary care agency providing support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. At the time of inspection, 7 people were receiving personal care support.

There were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership, governance, and the delivery of safe, effective care. People and their relatives spoke positively about the kindness and attentiveness of individual staff, however, the assessment found that care was not always person-centred or delivered in line with best practice. Staff had not received sufficient training, and there were no systems in place to assess their competence. Care plans lacked personalisation and did not reflect people’s preferences, goals, or cultural needs. People’s rights under the Mental Capacity Act were not upheld. The provider did not demonstrate a learning culture. Incidents were not consistently investigated, and opportunities to improve safety were missed. Safeguarding concerns were not always recognised or acted upon. Medicines were not managed safely, and documentation was inconsistent. Risk assessments were incomplete or lacked sufficient detail to mitigate known risks. Although staff demonstrated compassion and respect to people, records showed dismissive language used by leaders. Care plans lacked detail about people’s individual identities, preferences, and aspirations. Leadership was ineffective. The registered manager and provider failed to ensure compliance with their regulatory responsibilities. There was no effective system to monitor quality or drive improvement. Staff did not always feel listened to, and there was limited evidence of meaningful engagement or support.

The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staff recruitment, medicines management and consent. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to staffing and governance. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of these legal regulations. The service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

21 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Because We Care Northampton is a domiciliary care agency providing support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of inspection, four people were receiving personal care support.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were happy with the care they received. Staff treated people well, with kindness and were thoughtful and empowering. However, there were failings in relation to the management, governance and oversight of the service. The registered manager had failed to embed adequate governance structures to effectively review the service to ensure people received safe care and support. Staff did not have adequate training or supervision and the recruitment procedures did not support the safe delivery of care.

Improvements were required to ensure people received safe care. Risk assessments did not cover all of people’s known risks or provide sufficient guidance for staff about how to manage those risks. Opportunities for learning were limited as staff meetings and discussions were not recorded. People did not have regular reviews of their care.

Improvements were required to ensure people’s care plans were consistent and people were given the same opportunities to have personalised support for them; this included the opportunity to express their end of life care wishes.

Staff understood how to report safeguarding matters and people were supported with their medicines adequately. The service offered limited support to people with their nutritional needs however where necessary, this was provided. Staff ensured peoples’ healthcare needs were well managed.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. However, the policies and systems in the service did not always support this practice as mental capacity assessments were not always completed when required.

A complaints system was in place but had not yet been required. People understood they could make a complaint and felt able to do so. The registered manager was keen to ensure people received good care.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 30/11/2018 and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the date of registration.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvement. Please see the Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well Led sections of this full report.

Enforcement

We have identified breaches in relation to staff recruitment, training and supervision and the lack of governance in the service.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan for the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.