• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Main Office

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

147 Narborough Road, Leicester, LE3 0PD 07863 667722

Provided and run by:
RT-Care Solution Limited

Important: We are carrying out a review of quality at Main Office. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

All Inspections

8 January 2024

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Main Office is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 5 people using the service.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 3 people receiving a regulated activity.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

At the time of the inspection, the location did not care or support for anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

Right Support:

Some people did not have all relevant health specific risk assessments in place, but staff had received training relevant to their roles including Learning Disabilities and Autism.

Some people did not appear to always receive medicines they were prescribed. Audit systems were not effectively used to identify gaps in recording of medicines in a timely manner.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice but was not embedded.

Right Culture:

Oversight of the service required improvement. We identified shortfalls at inspection that had not been independently identified by systems and processes already in place. These included audits not effectively being used to identify risk. This meant opportunities to make improvements were lost. People using the service and staff felt the culture was open, and the registered manager was easily accessible. Concerns raised were listened to and people and staff had faith the registered manager would act upon any issues to make positive changes for people where needed. People were happy with the care they received from a consistent team of care workers.

Right Care:

Systems were in place to identify safeguarding concerns, although there were no recorded incidents to review to demonstrate practice was embedded. Staff were able to identify adult safeguarding concerns and the registered manager was aware of their responsibility to investigate and report concerns to relevant partner agencies.

People were supported by staff who were highly passionate about delivering good care and going above and beyond for people. Staff understood consent and processes to support the assessment of people’s capacity was in place. It was difficult to establish if practice was embedded as people’s capacity in relation to decision specific choices had not been assessed.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was inadequate (published 02 November 2022) and there were breaches of regulation. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found the provider remained in breach of some regulations.

Why we inspected

We carried out an announced inspection of this service on 08 January 2024. Breaches of legal requirements were found. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve how risks were identified and monitored; how medicines were administered; how staff were recruited safely and how governance of the service would be improved.

We undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to the Key Questions Safe, Effective and Well-led which contain those requirements.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. The overall rating for the service has changed from Inadequate to Requires Improvement. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Main Office on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified breaches in relation to people’s care needs and associated risks not always being assessed; safe administration of medicines and how the service was governed at this inspection.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety.

27 June 2022

During a routine inspection

About the service

Main Office is a domiciliary care service providing personal care. The service provides support to older people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were seven people using the service.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were not kept safe from the risk of harm. The provider failed to identify risks to people, which placed them at increased risk of harm. The provider failed to implement robust systems to assess known risks to people. People's medicines were not managed in line with good practice. The registered manager failed to ensure robust pre-employment checks were undertaken prior to staff working at the service. The registered manager failed to learn lessons when things went wrong.

People did not receive effective care. Staff did not always receive appropriate training to allow them to effectively carry out their role. Mental capacity assessments did not contain the required information and did not meet the expectations of the relevant legislation.

The service was not always caring. Whilst relatives told us their family members were looked after well, the culture of the service impacted on this, and placed people at risk of receiving care that did not always meet their needs.

People did not receive personalised care that reflected their needs and preferences. Care plans were inadequate and failed to give staff clear guidance on meeting people's diverse needs. People's communication needs were not always met.

There were significant and widespread concerns in relation to the management of this service. This meant that people did not receive care from a service that was well-led. The provider failed to implement systems and processes to ensure adequate governance and monitoring of the service.

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; and the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

This service was registered with us on 25 February 2019 and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

We inspected this service as part of our regulatory function.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Enforcement

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.

We have identified breaches in relation to keeping people safe from harm, safe recruitment and the management oversight of the service at this inspection.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

Follow up

We will meet with the provider following this report being published to discuss how they will make changes to ensure they improve their rating to at least good. We will work with the local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe and there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.

For adult social care services, the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it and it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions, it will no longer be in special measures.