• Doctor
  • GP practice

Glenpark Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Ravensworth Road, Dunston, Gateshead, NE11 9FJ (0191) 420 0535

Provided and run by:
Glenpark Medical Practice

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Glenpark Medical Practice on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Glenpark Medical Practice, you can give feedback on this service.

15 March 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at Glenpark Medical Practice on 15th March 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as good, with the key question of are services well-led rated as outstanding.

The ratings for each key question are:

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Outstanding

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Glenpark Medical Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection as part of our inspection programme. The service had not been previously inspected at this address.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit
  • Staff questionnaires

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • There was a truly holistic approach to assessing, planning and delivering care and treatment to all people who use services.
  • All staff were actively engaged in activities to monitor and improve quality and outcomes.
  • Staff, teams and services were committed to working collaboratively and had found innovative and efficient ways to deliver more joined-up care to people who use services.
  • Staff were consistent in supporting people to live healthier lives, including identifying those who needed extra support, through a targeted and proactive approach to health promotion and prevention of ill-health, and they used every contact with people to do so.
  • Engagement with stakeholders, including people who use services and those close to them, informed the development of tools such as a deferred treatment protocol and COVID19 template. Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
  • There was compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership at all levels. Leaders at all levels demonstrated the high levels of experience, capacity and capability needed to deliver excellent and sustainable care.
  • Leaders had a deep understanding of issues, challenges and priorities in their service, and beyond.
  • Strategies and plans were fully aligned with plans in the wider health economy, and there was a demonstrated commitment to system-wide collaboration and leadership.
  • Plans were consistently implemented, and had a positive impact on quality and sustainability of services
  • Leaders had an inspiring shared purpose, and strove to deliver and motivate staff to succeed. There were high levels of satisfaction across all staff, staff were proud of the organisation as a place to work and spoke highly of the culture.
  • Staff at all levels were actively encouraged to speak up and raise concerns, and all policies and procedures positively support this process.
  • There was strong collaboration, team-working and support across all functions and a common focus on improving the quality and sustainability of care and people’s experiences.
  • A systematic approach was taken to working with other organisations to improve care outcomes.
  • The service took a leadership role in its health system to identify and proactively address challenges and meet the needs of the population.
  • There was a strong record of sharing work locally and nationally.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care