• Doctor
  • GP practice

Wide Way Surgery

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Wide Way Medical Centre, 15 Wide Way, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 1BP (020) 8623 1300

Provided and run by:
Wide Way Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Wide Way Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Wide Way Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

13 March 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Wide Way Surgery on 13 March 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

07 August 2018

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Outstanding overall. (Previous rating 8 October 2015 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Outstanding

Are services well-led? - Outstanding

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wide Way Surgery on 7 August 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was carried out in line with our next phase inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • The practice understood the needs of its population and tailored services in response to those needs. There was evidence of a number of projects and services the practice had been involved with to ensure patients’ needs were met.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation and engagement with external organisations to improve the quality of services delivered for practice patients and the local population.

We saw areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had developed a number of bespoke protocols and ‘intelligent’ templates on the electronic record system which included automated prompt messages for care plans, referral forms and direct links to guidance and local services, so that GPs were able to ensure patients received standardised, up to date and timely care and treatment at the point of need. There was evidence that these tailored systems had been shared with and formally adopted by the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and sent to all CCG practices.
  • The practice had initiated and developed the proposal for an improved approach to diabetes care and worked with in the local community healthcare NHS trust to deliver this. The proposal was piloted in the practice before being piloted in the three other Primary Care Home (PCH) practices. As part of the project, a diabetes ‘academy’ meeting was set up for staff education and sharing ideas; the lead GP arranged accredited diabetes training for 13 staff across the PCH practices and the practice developed systems to ensure close monitoring for complex diabetic patients. The project involved directly bookable diabetes clinics with a community specialist diabetic nurse via remote email, telephone and joint consultations. Unverified data showed that outcomes for diabetic patients had improved over the last year as a result. The project was in the process of being developed across CCG practices.
  • The practice identified the need for additional primary care input into a local care home to improve outcomes for older people. As part of this project, the practice strengthened their systems which ensured older people with frailty received effective care and treatment. The six-month pilot project of weekly ward rounds, joint working and improved access commenced in December 2017. Data from the CCG compared with the previous year showed that after the pilot, the care home had dropped from the first to the fifth highest ambulance conveyor and the number of ambulance conveyances had reduced from 46 in 2017 to 12 in 2018 after the pilot, which was a 74% reduction in ambulance service use by the care home. As a result of this pilot, the scheme had begun to be rolled out CCG wide.
  • A social prescribing project which was particularly utilised by vulnerable patients, had produced a reduction in both the number of GP appointments and accident and emergency (A&E) visits by these patients. One of the partners developed the social prescribing model for the CCG. The practice then volunteered to be involved in a local CCG pilot model of Social Prescribing aimed to connect medical care with local voluntary and community resources. Social prescribing appointments were delivered by a Social Prescribing Coordinator (SPC) two days per week. Across the first three months of the project, 138 patients visited two practices for social prescribing appointments (approximately 104 patients from Wide Way Surgery). The pilot saw a significant increase in health and wellbeing for patients as well as significant decreases in both number of GP appointments (by 543) and A&E attendances (by 29 visits) in patients referred to the service. Patients reported better self-management as a result of the scheme. From April 2018 the social prescribing programme was rolled out across nine GP practices in the CCG.
  • The practice provided innovative services to support staff and foster a positive culture including staff awards, a daily coffee ‘debrief’ session, three times weekly chair yoga sessions and a well-being services package for staff. The practice was the first practice in South West London to provide additional well-being services for staff.
  • The practice had undergone a £1 million premises expansion and redevelopment, which was completed in 2018, partially funded by the practice.
  • The practice had initiated and led the creation of the first collaborative working Primary Care Home site in South West London. The lead GP partner was the chair of the local GP collaborative primary care home and the managing partner was the director of the organisation. The practice had been approached by neighbouring London CCGs for advice and sharing their experience of developing primary care at scale. The practice invested time and knowledge to lead the primary care home collaborative, which resulted in improvements in services to benefit the practice population.
  • The practice successfully wrote a bid on behalf of the CCG to be part of the NHS England Clinical Pharmacist Programme. The bid led to funding for four clinical pharmacists, one for each PCH practice. The practice continued to drive the Clinical Pharmacist Programme locally, providing clinical and managerial leadership.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Further develop quality improvement systems to include monitoring and analysing trends from verbal patient feedback.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

8 October 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wide Way Medical Centre on 8 October 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the CQC at that time.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents. Information about safety was recorded, monitored and actions were taken to make improvements when required;
  • Risk assessments were completed and kept under review;
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered following best practice guidance;
  • Staff received training appropriate to their roles and further training needs were identified and planned;
  • Patients told us they were treated well, with dignity and respect and they were involved in decisions about their care and treatment;
  • Patients said staff were kind, helpful, friendly, caring, polite, compassionate and thorough;
  • Information about the services provided and how to make a complaint were accessible to patients at the practice, in the patient information leaflet and on the practice website;
  • Patients who spoke with us generally reported good experiences of getting appointments with the walk in clinics felt to be particularly beneficial;
  • The practice provided appointments outside of work and school hours and urgent appointments were provided on the same day;
  • The practice had good facilities and was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs;
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management;
  • The practice sought feedback from patients and staff and acted upon it.

However there were areas where the provider should make improvements.

Importantly, the provider should:

  • Ensure when the fridge temperatures are outside the required range, actions staff take are clearly recorded.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice