• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Bluebird Care (Scarborough & Bridlington)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Cayley Court, Hopper Hill Road, Eastfield Business Park, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO11 3YJ (01723) 588004

Provided and run by:
Lydiam Limited

All Inspections

18 August 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 18 August 2015 and was announced. There had been no breaches of regulations when the service was last inspected on 5 November 2013.

Bluebird Care (Scarborough & Bridlington) is a domiciliary care service providing support and personal care to people in their own homes in the Scarborough and Bridlington areas. The service can support younger adults and older people who have physical health conditions, sensory impairment or dementia. There was no registered manager at the service on the day of our inspection but there was a manager employed who had started the process of registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) because a registered manager is required for this service.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff were recruited safely and received training that was relevant to their roles. There was sufficient staff employed to meet people’s needs. They were supported through supervision by senior staff.

Care plans were comprehensive and had associated risk assessments. Medicines were managed safely. People were protected because staff at this service were aware of and followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005.

Staff had been trained to recognise and report abuse which meant that people who used the service could be confident that staff knew how to alert the appropriate people if it was necessary.

Most of the people who used the service were positive in their comments about staff. However there were some people who felt that improvements were needed because some people felt that their care was rushed and that care workers did not listen to them. We have made a recommendation about treating people with dignity and respect.

The service was well led by a director and manager who both had experience of working in social care services. In order to monitor and maintain the quality of the service audits had been completed and quality assurance surveys carried out.

5 November 2013

During a routine inspection

People told us 'I am very satisfied. Good service' and 'I am not looking to change anything I am satisfied with my carer'. They said that staff always treated them with dignity and respect.

Staff who spoke with us said that they always tried to ensure they treated people who use the service with dignity and respect. The said that their rota could be flexible with timings, this meant they were able to give extra time to people on occasion.

We saw several care plans and these identified the level of support each person needed. They also contained risk assessments. The documents had been signed by the person they were about.

People told us that they felt safe when receiving care and if they had any concerns they would report them to the office. Staff told us that if they had any concerns about the people they were supporting then would tell the manager.

We saw staff records and these indicated that people had been thoroughly checked prior to their recruitment. This ensured they were suitable to work with people who may be vulnerable.

The manager told us they had implemented some elements of the quality assurance programme and were looking to introduce more. This would ensure that the support people received was appropriate.