• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Darlison Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Ogle Street, off Annesley Road, Hucknall, Nottingham, NG15 7DR (01623) 880865

Provided and run by:
Fosse Healthcare Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Darlison Court is an Extra Care Housing scheme. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is bought or rented and is the occupant's own home. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people's personal care and support service.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates the personal care and support that people may receive. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating.

Who the service is for

The service supported people with dementia, physical disabilities and learning disabilities in their own flats. There were 9 people using the service at the time of the assessment.Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 19 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the providerhad regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

There was a positive learning culture within the service. The provider demonstrated a positive learning culture where incidents, concerns and feedback were reviewed. Lessons learnt and actions were implemented where required.

People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Risks were assessed and people were involved in the process.

There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse. The provider completed regular reviews of safeguarding events to establish key themes and trends.

Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and were confident in recognising, reporting and responding to concerns to keep people safe from abuse and avoidable harm.

Some care records did not consistently include detailed information relating to specific healthcare needs; however, staff demonstrated a good understanding of people's needs.

The provider frequently arranged parties for the people living at the service. They also raised money for charity, giving back to the local community.

Medicines were managed safely, with clear procedures for administration, recording, storage and monitoring within people's homes. Staff told us “All medications are on their [medicine administration record] chart. Calls are spaced at intervals to correspond to the times they need their medication.

The provider had worked exceptionally hard to support people to meet their goals and outcomes. The provider evidenced reconnecting people with estranged family members, including supporting them to visit family. The provider supported people to access community activities of their interest and assisted people with decorating their flats when they moved into the service. They had also supported people from residential care into more independent living.

Governance and quality assurance systems were effective in monitoring service performance. Audits, feedback, incident reviews and oversight processes were used to support learning and improve outcomes for people. The provider demonstrated a commitment to innovation and learning, ensuring the service continued to develop and respond to the changing needs of people receiving care.

2 October 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Darlison Court is an Extra Care Housing scheme that provides personal care for ten people living in their own flats on one purpose-built premise.

People’s experience of using this service

People received care that reduced the risk to their safety. Incidents that could affect people’s safety were reported to the relevant authorities. There were enough staff to care for people safely. People received their medicine safely, although we were concerned about the high stock levels of one medicine for one person. Action was being taken to address this. Staff understood how to reduce the risk of the spread of infection in people’s flats. Learning from mistakes took place to reduce the risk of recurrence.

People received care in line with their assessed needs. Staff training was up to date and staff received supervision of their practice. Where people received support with their meals, staff did so effectively and in line with dietary requirements. Guidance for staff to support a person with diabetes was not comprehensive enough should they have a seizure. Action was being taken to address this. People had access to other health and social care agencies if needed. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. We did note one person required a further mental capacity assessment to be completed for one element of care to ensure their rights were respected

People praised the approach of staff. They found them to be kind, caring and respectful. Personal care was provided in a dignified way, maintaining people’s privacy. People’s independence was always encouraged. People were supported to make decisions about their care. People’s records were stored securely and handled appropriately to protect their privacy.

People’s care records were person-centred and contained guidance for staff to support them in their preferred way. Efforts had been made to provide people with information in formats they could understand. Innovative plans were in place to further support people with a sensory impairment. People were supported to reduce the risk of them becoming socially isolated. A robust complaints process was in place. End of life care was not currently provided.

Quality assurance processes helped the provider and the registered manager to identify and act on areas which could pose a risk to people’s safety. The registered manager had a good knowledge of their regulatory requirement to report concerns to the CQC. People and staff praised the approach of the registered manager, they found him to be supportive and approachable. People’s views were requested and acted on.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update This service was registered with us on 11 October 2018 and this is the first inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.