• Doctor
  • GP practice

Whitemoor Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Whitemoor Lane, Belper, Derbyshire, DE56 0JB (01773) 880099

Provided and run by:
Whitemoor Medical Centre

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 15-17 October 2025.

Whitemoor Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 12,515 people under a contract held with NHS England. We carried out an assessment of this service because it has not been inspected since 5 April 2016. The National General Practice Profiles states that the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 97.4% white, 1.3% mixed, 0.7% Asian, 0.3% black and other 0.2%. The age distribution of the practice population shows there is a higher number of older people registered with the practice and a lower number of working age and young people. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated complaints thoroughly however investigations into significant events lacked detail. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff mostly managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people to make decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff well-being and had recently become an accredited Active Practice which recognised practices committed to increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour for both staff and patients.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff to develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were very receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas. The practice worked very closely with the local Primary Care Network to deliver care in innovative ways and participated in research studies which potentially offered enhanced care for some of their patients.

5 April 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Whitemoor medical centre on 5 April 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events. Learning was shared with staff at meetings.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. Health and safety precautions had been taken which included checking equipment was fully working and safe to use and infection prevention control measures were in place.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. Personal development was encouraged and provision made regularly for this for all staff via the appraisal process.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed patient outcomes were at or above average compared to the national average. They had achieved 97% of the total points available with an exception reporting rate of 7%
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Feedback from patients about their care was positive, however, patients reported that it was difficult to access a routine appointment. Same day appointments were available for urgent needs.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. This included baby changing facilities and treatment rooms which had been purpose built.
  • The practice implemented suggestions for improvements and made changes to the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and the patient participation group.
  • The practice had a clear vision which was patient focussed. The strategy to deliver this vision had been shared with staff.

We saw two areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice proactively conducted a comprehensive case review of any suicide, which included external reviewers to improve clinicians’ identification of those at risk of self-harm
  • The practice worked in collaboration with four local practices on a project to drive improvement in care for older people and reduce emergency admissions from care homes. This had resulted in an 8% reduction in emergency admissions in the preceding 12 months.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice