• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Crowmoor House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Frith Avenue, Shrewsbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 5XW (01743) 235835

Provided and run by:
Coverage Care Services Limited

All Inspections

9 February 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 9 February 2016 and was unannounced.

Crowmoor House is registered to provide accommodation with personal care to a maximum of 57 people. There were 52 people living at the home on the day of our inspection. The home provides care and support for older people some of whom were living with dementia, mental health or learning disabilities.

A registered manager was in post and was present during our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff had received training in and understood how to protect people from any harm and abuse. Systems were in place for staff to follow which protected people and kept them safe. Staff knew how to and were confident in reporting any concerns they may have about a person’s safety.

People were happy they were supported by sufficient numbers of staff to safely meet their needs. When people needed or asked for help and support they were not kept waiting and staff responded swiftly. The registered manager monitored how many staff were needed based on people’s individual needs. Checks were completed on potential new staff to make sure they were suitable to work with people living at the home.

People were supported to take their medicines safely and when they needed them. Medicines were stored safely and only staff who had received training and been assessed as competent were able to support people with their medicines.

Staff asked people’s permission before they helped them with any care or support. People’s right to make their own decisions about their own care and treatment were supported by staff. Where people were unable to make their own decisions these were made in their best interests by people who knew them and other relevant professionals.

Staff supported people to maintain a healthy balanced diet and supported them to make their own choices about what they wanted to eat and drink. People’s routine health needs were met and referrals were made quickly when people needed other health care support or staff were worried about a person’s health.

People were supported by staff who knew them well and had good relationships with them. Staff made sure people were involved in their own care and made sure they understood information that was given to them. People were treated with dignity and respect and staff understood how important this was in the way they cared for people.

People were happy with the care and support they received and gave positive comments about the staff and management at the home. Care that staff gave was personal to each person and people were supported to spend their time how they wanted to.

People knew how to raise complaints but told us they had not needed to. They were able to give their opinions of the home and the care they received at meetings and through surveys. People felt involved in what happened at the home and felt staff and management listened to them.

The home had a positive culture where staff worked for the benefit of the people they supported. The provider had systems in place which assessed and monitored the quality of care and support staff provided at the home.

30 July 2013

During a routine inspection

People shared good experiences of the care and support they received. Comments included, "I have no complaints, and I am well cared for here'. People said they felt safe living at the home.

Staff told us they had attended a range of training courses to equip them with the knowledge and skills to effectively carry out their duties. They felt well supported in their roles.

There was evidence that people's views and the opinion of their relatives were being sought and listened to. The majority of people told us they were asked on a daily basis if they were alright and could attend formal meetings if they wished.

The provider conducted quality meetings to gain people's views about their care and how the service was run. The provider monitored the service with systems in place to enable them to identify problems swiftly and act upon them to keep people safe. This meant people benefitted from safe care due to effective decision making.