• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Broomwood Road Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

41 Broomwood Road, St Pauls Cray, Orpington, Kent, BR5 2JP (01689) 832454

Provided and run by:
The Broomwood Road Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Broomwood Road Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Broomwood Road Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

28 September 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about The Broomwood Road Surgery on 28 September 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

28 March 2018

During a routine inspection

We previously carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Broomwood Road Surgery on 28 June 2017 as part of our inspection programme. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report for 28 June 2017 can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Broomwood Road Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection carried out on 28 March 2018. The inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014 as part of our inspection programme.

Overall the practice is now rated as Good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Systems and processes had been reviewed to ensure good governance, all staff had completed role specific training. Since the last inspection the practice had changed their training process, they had set up a mandatory/recommended training matrix for all staff which recorded role specific training.

  • There was a process for logging and recording prescription pads and forms.

    • Consent procedures had been reviewed against legislative requirements.

    • Arrangements had been reviewed for the appropriate disposal of sharps.

    • The practice had systems in place to manage significant events; however, they were not always recorded.

    • Although the practice had a safety alert system, not all alerts were followed up; however, after the inspection the practice provided an updated protocol for reviewing alerts.

    • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

    • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.

    • Staff treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

    • The practice had a designated care coordinator for vulnerable patients, and patients with complex needs all patients were given a direct phone number for the care coordinator which gave them easy access to contact the surgery.

    • Patients we spoke with said they found it difficult to make an appointment with a named GP and there was lack of continuity of care; however, urgent appointments were available the same day.

    • The service installed free Wifi for patients and got staff members to show patients how to book appointments on line.

We saw areas of outstanding practice:

The practice organised a patient/community event called “New year, New you day” on 18 January 2018 to target all patients to become healthier socially, emotionally, mentally and physically. They had stalls throughout the practice such as Bromley mental health, Weight Watchers, MIND (a mental health charity) and a local paramedic team; 109 patients attended. The practice arranged for a gym to attend, they undertook health checks, and signposted patients. As a result of the event they carried out 24 health checks, referred two patients for smoking cessation and six patients to Weight Watchers. Following on from the “New year, New you day” the practice also set up weekly walks/runs from the practice for all patients every Wednesday afternoon and Saturday morning. At the time of inspection the practice had seven patients attending each week.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review record keeping of all significant events to ensure they are always documented.

  • Review processes for monitoring that patient results are actioned in a timely manner.

  • Review installing an external thermometer for medicine stored at room temperature.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

28 June 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Broomwood Road Surgery on19 February 2015. The overall rating for the practice was good with requires improvement in the responsive key question. The full comprehensive report on the 19 February 2015 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Broomwood Road Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection on 28 June 2017. Overall the practice is now rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was no process for the security of prescription pads/forms; however, shortly after the inspection the practice provided us with a new policy detailing a new system that had been implemented to record prescription pads and forms.
  • Not all staff had completed role specific training on the day of inspection; however, shortly after the inspection, the practice provided us with evidence to show all staff were up to date with training.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice was recording verbal consent had been obtained for implants, and long-acting reversible contraceptives.
  • The practice had systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they found it difficult to make an appointment with a named GP and there was lack of continuity of care; however, urgent appointments were available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.
  • The practice won a ‘Star Practice’ award within Bromley by Public Health in 2016 for high levels of Chlamydia screening for patients age 16-24.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • The practice organised a diabetes prevention day on 18 May 2017 to target all pre-diabetic patients. They had a gym company on site; HBA1C test strips were handed out to attendees, so they could check their blood glucose levels. The practice sent out 300 invites and had a turnout of 200 patients. They identified two previously undiagnosed patients with diabetes as a result, that would not have been identified had it not been for the prevention day.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • Review systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care, ensuring all staff training is maintained and up to date.
  • Ensure there is a process for logging and recording prescription pads and forms.
  • Ensure improvements are made to the availability/access to appointments in response to patient feedback.

In addition the provider should:

  • Review arrangements for appropriate disposal of sharps.
  • Review the business continuity plan regularly to ensure it covers disruptions for patients and plan how best to meet the needs of different patient groups in such situations.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

13 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of the practice on 19 February 2015. Breaches of legal requirements were found. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice did not submit their action plan. However we were sent the action plan in June 2016 ahead of the focussed inspection. The practice wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches of regulation 17 (2)(a)(e) Good governance of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

We undertook this desk-based focussed inspection on 13 June 2016 to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met the legal requirements. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also where additional improvements have been made following the initial inspection. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Broomwood Road Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Overall the practice was rated as Good following the comprehensive inspection, however they were rated as requiring improvement for responsive services. They were also found to be requires improvement for working age people (including those recently retired and students). Specifically, following the focussed inspection we found the practice to remain as requires improvement for providing responsive services.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Information about services was updated and available in the reception area in relation to appointments and online appointment access.
  • The practice had promoted online access to appointments, promoted use of the local GP hub for appointments when the practice was closed and increased availability of pre-bookable appointments.
  • However, data from the national GP patient survey indicated on-going difficulties with getting through to the practice by telephone and difficulty booking appointments.
  • The practice had gathered feedback from complaints which indicated that there was some improvement in satisfaction with appointments.
  • Systems to improve the quality of the services provided and the quality of the experience of service users in receiving those services were not fully in place. There had been no patient satisfaction surveys undertaken since the comprehensive inspection in conjunction with the Patient Participation Group (PPG).

Importantly, the provider must:

  • Review systems to improve the quality of the services provided and the quality of the experience of service users by undertaking patient surveys and acting on concerns identified.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

19 February 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We undertook

a comprehensive inspection of The Broomwood Road Surgery on 19 February 2015.

We rated The Broomwood Road Surgery overall as Good. We rated it as Good for providing safe, effective, caring and well-led services. We rated it as requires improvement for providing responsive services. We rated The Broomwood Road Surgery as Good for providing services to Older people, People with long term conditions, Families, children and young people, People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable, and People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). We rated it as requires improvement for providing services to Working age people (including those recently retired and students).

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed
  • The practice clinical team referenced published evidence based guidance and their local clinical commissioning group care pathways in the delivery of care and treatment, and in ensuring positive health outcomes for its patients
  • The practice used the Quality and Outcomes framework to measure, monitor and improve performance; and was performing better when compared to the average performances of other practices locally and nationally
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it difficult to get through to the practice by telephone, and that there were insufficient appointments available when they needed to see the GP.
  • The practice was well led, and staff were supported with training and development. The practice made improvements in response to staff and patient feedback.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • ensure improvements are made to the availability of appointments in the service in response to patient feedback.

In addition, the provider should:

  • Ensure arrangements are in place to review urgent test results and other correspondence allocated to the practice GPs who worked part time, during the periods they were not in the practice.
  • Ensure information displayed in the practice waiting area is relevant and up to date.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice