• Doctor
  • GP practice

Rustlings Road Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

105 Rustlings Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S11 7AB (0114) 268 4567

Provided and run by:
Rustlings Road Medical Centre

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 13 August 2026. Rustlings Road Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 4,550 people in Sheffield under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 84.8% White, 8% Asian, 3.7% Mixed, 1.7% Black and 1.8% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 10th decile (10 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure people were kept safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection well and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes. Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity. People could mostly access care, treatment and support when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers. The service had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

28 February 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 20 June 2016. The practice was rated as requires improvement for ‘well led’. Following the inspection, the practice sent us an Action Plan in September 2016 to state what they would do to improve their service.

This inspection was an or carried out on 28 February 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 20 June 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.  

  • We saw evidence that the practice had introduced a rolling programme of clinical audit and re-audit to improve patient outcomes and services.
  • The practice had developed a Disclosure and Barring policy.
  • We saw evidence that all practice policies had front cover sheets which identified implementation and review dates.
  • We saw a schedule of regular staff meetings was in place.
  • The practice had difficulty in attending the CCG protected learning sessions however w We saw evidence of regular in house learning sessions. These were well attended by all staff groups.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

20 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Rustlings Road Surgery on 20 June 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were generally assessed and well managed.
  • Staff had been trained to provide patients with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had satisfactory facilities and was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • Staff felt supported by management. The practice sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider must make improvement are:

  • Introduce a rolling programme of clinical audit and re-audit to improve patient outcomes and services.
  • The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, however the Disclosure and Barring (DBS) policy was missing and all policies needed updating to include a front cover sheet and implementation and review dates.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice