• Doctor
  • GP practice

Crabbs Cross Surgery

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

1 Kenilworth Close, Crabbs Cross, Redditch, B97 5JX (01527) 544610

Provided and run by:
Crabbs Cross Surgery

All Inspections

31 Aug 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive/focused inspection at Crabbs Cross Surgery on 31 August 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

Safe - Good

Effective – Requires Improvement

Well-led – Requires Improvement

Following our previous inspection on 7 February 2017, the practice was rated Good overall and for all key questions.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Crabbs Cross Surgery www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection included a comprehensive review of information and a site visit where we inspected safe, effective, responsive and well-led care. Additionally, we reviewed access to the practice via telephone and a patient’s ability to book in with named GP’s.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, considering the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently. Therefore, as part of this inspection we completed clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussed the findings with the provider. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

The inspection also included:

  • Requesting and reviewing evidence and information from the service
  • A site visit
  • Conducting staff interviews
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management. However, oversight of some systems was not effective.
  • The practice had completed some quality improvement activities but did not routinely review the effectiveness of changes made as a response. There was limited monitoring of the outcomes of care and treatment.
  • The practice consistently worked with other organisations to deliver effective care and treatment. Patients could be referred to a single point of access for concerns surrounding mental health; they were then signposted to other services.
  • The practice was not routinely able to evidence that staff had received training in some areas. However, discussions with staff provided assurance that they had the required skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.
  • The practice did not always have effective systems for monitoring the storage of medicines. In particular, we found that some medication stored in vaccination fridges were out of date.
  • The practice did not always have effective systems for the appropriate and safe use of medicines as some medication was found to be out of date in the medication fridges, in addition staff did not always have the appropriate authorisations to administer medicines, (including patient group Directions
  • The practice had completed quality improvement activities but did not routinely review the effectiveness of changes made as a response. There was limited monitoring of the outcomes of care and treatment.

We found Regulation 17 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Good governance breach of regulations.

The provider must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Whilst we found breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Take steps to improve the clarity of policies and procedures for staff regarding identified leads in areas such as freedom to speak up guardians.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

7 February 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out a focused desk based inspection of Crabbs Cross Surgery on 7 February 2017 to check that action had been taken since our previous inspection on 25 November 2015. At the inspection in November 2015, the practice was rated as good overall but rated as requires improvement for the safe domain.

We found that the practice required improvement in the safe domain due to a breach of regulation relating to safe care and treatment. This was because:

  • The practice had not undertaken a Legionella risk assessment, therefore the risk to patients and staff of infection by the Legionella bacteria had not been established.

On 7 February 2017 we reviewed the information the practice submitted to us to ensure that they had followed their action plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection of Crabbs Cross Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Our key findings for this inspection were as follows:

The provider had made improvements:

  • They had commissioned the services of an external contractor to carry out Legionella testing, and implemented the actions recommended from the assessment.

The practice is now rated good for safe services.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

25 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice


We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Crabbs Cross Surgery on 25 November 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed. We saw evidence where significant events and complaints were discussed and saw examples of changing practice in response to these. Risks to patients were assessed and well managed with the exception of a legionella risk assessment.

  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.

  • Patients described staff as compassionate, caring and respectful.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

The provider must:

  • Carry out a Legionella risk assessment

The provider should:

  • Review staff files to ensure all documentation required under current legislation is recorded.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice