• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Brook Square Surgery Also known as Trafalgar Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Trafalgar House, 41-44 Trafalgar Street West, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 7AS (01723) 360098

Provided and run by:
Brook Square Surgery

All Inspections

04/11/2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused comprehensive inspection at Brook Square Surgery on 4 November 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We decided to undertake an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us. This inspection looked at the following key questions Effective and Well led. The rating for caring, safe and responsive were carried forward to this inspection from the previous inspection.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Review and Improve the process for monitoring prescription stationery throughout the practice.
  • Review and improve the process for monitoring exception reporting.
  • Review and improve the process for cancer referrals.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

25/11/2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 12 November 2014. A breach of legal requirements was found. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to ensuring that all staff had the appropriate medical indemnity insurance in place and responding to a known risk.

We undertook this focused desk based inspection to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Our key findings across the area we inspected were as follows:

The provider had completed all the actions within the action plan that was put in place and provided to CQC at the time of the comprehensive inspection. They demonstrated they had closely monitored the management of the identified risk in a timely and appropriate way. There was clear evidence of involvement and consultation with NHS England and CQC throughout.

A range of actions had been put in place and embedded within the practice to avoid a recurrence of such an event. 

The provider demonstrated that they had met the legal requirements.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

12/11/2014

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out a comprehensive inspection of Brook Square Surgery on 12 November 2014.

We rated the practice overall as Good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Staff told us there were usually enough staff to maintain the smooth running of the practice and there were always enough staff on duty to keep patients safe. However, we identified during the inspection an area of concern regarding the safety of some patients.
  • The practice had systems in place for monitoring the needs of patients and mechanisms for encouraging patients to attend for routine reviews, for example annual health checks and cervical smears. There was a good skill mix among the staff group with staff having a range of qualifications.
  • Patients told us they were treated with dignity and respect. They said staff listened, were helpful, supporting and caring.
  • The practice was responsive to the needs of patients and took into account any comments, concerns or complaints to improve the practice. The practice reviewed the needs of its local population and engaged with the NHS Area Team and Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to secure improvements to services where these were identified.
  • The practice was well led, with an accessible and visible management team with clear direction. Governance systems are processes were in place and quality management information was available and used to improve outcomes for patients.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had appointed a Health and Social Care Co-ordinator to lead on the management of patients on the care management register. This role involved close working with nursing and residential homes to devise care plans for patients.

However, there were areas of practice where the provider needed to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • The practice must ensure they assess and manage all risks and put actions in place to mitigate risk in a timely way. Since June 2014 the practice had assumed that all GPs had medical indemnity but one GP did not. Whilst the practice had attempted for three months to confirm the GP was insured, at the time of our inspection the practice had not received confirmation and had not taken steps to ensure the GP was insured in the interim. The practice responded appropriately on the day of the inspection to mitigate the identified risk and this issue was referred to NHS England. We believe that this issue pertains to all of the population groups, although overall our view is that you provide good services that are effective, caring, responsive and well led, for each of the population groups.

The provider should:

  • Ensure the safeguarding lead is trained to Level 3 in safeguarding adults and children.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice