• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness and Wellbeing Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Pyford Road, West Byfleet, Guildford, GU22 8UQ 0845 154 6483

Provided and run by:
Nuffield Health

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness and Wellbeing Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness and Wellbeing Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

22 April 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out a comprehensive inspection of Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness and Wellbeing Centre on 22 April 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This was the first rated inspection of the service. The service was previously inspected in September 2018, when it was not rated but was found to be meeting all regulations.

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Speaking with staff in person and using video conferencing.
  • Requesting documentary evidence from the provider.
  • A site visit.

We carried out an announced site visit to the service on 22 April 2022. Prior to our visit we requested documentary evidence electronically from the provider. We spoke to staff using video conferencing prior to our site visit.

Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness & Wellbeing Centre is part of Nuffield Health, a not-for-profit healthcare provider. The service provides health assessments which include a range of screening processes. The health assessment service is based within the fitness centre. Patients are able to choose from a range of health assessments according to their need. Assessment and screening services are led by either a physiologist or a doctor. Following assessment and screening, patients undergo a consultation to discuss the findings and any recommended lifestyle changes or treatment planning. The service employs two doctors, a general manager, a clinic manager (who is also a physiologist), a physiotherapist and two physiology staff. Patients seen within the service are either private patients or employees of organisations who are provided with health and wellbeing services as part of their employee benefit package. Services are provided to adults only.

The service is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. For example, physiotherapy and lifestyle coaching do not fall within the regulated activities for which the location is registered with CQC.

Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness & Wellbeing Centre is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide the following regulated activities: Treatment of disease, disorder or injury and Diagnostic and screening procedures.

The general manager is also the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff underwent comprehensive induction processes and had received training in key areas.
  • Staff employed by the service had undergone appraisal, peer review and regular 1 to 1 review.
  • There were records to demonstrate that recruitment checks had been carried out in accordance with regulations. However, document storage arrangements were not well managed and local managers did not always have oversight of those assurance checks.
  • There were effective systems and processes to assess monitor and control the spread of infection.
  • There were safeguarding systems and processes to keep people safe. Staff had received training in the safeguarding of adults and children.
  • Arrangements for chaperoning were effectively managed.
  • There were appropriate arrangements to manage medical emergencies and suitable emergency medicines and equipment in place.
  • There were fire safety processes and health and safety risk assessments in place.
  • Clinical record keeping was clear, comprehensive and complete.
  • There was monitoring of patient related outcomes and auditing of clinical record keeping processes.
  • Governance and monitoring processes provided assurance to leaders that systems were operating as intended. Risks were promptly identified and responded to.
  • Best practice guidance was followed in providing treatment to patients. For example, urgent referrals were made in response to a suspected cancer diagnosis.
  • Referral and signposting pathways were clearly documented, and referral processes were rigorously monitored. Signposting criteria relating to some patient test results were under review.
  • There was open communication amongst the staff team which was well documented and monitored to ensure agreed actions were completed.
  • Policies and procedures were monitored, reviewed and kept up to date with relevant and sufficient information, to provide effective guidance to staff.
  • There was a range of local and national initiatives to support the well-being of staff.
  • Service users were routinely asked to provide feedback on the service they had received. Complaints were managed appropriately.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review arrangements for the storage of staff recruitment and personnel records, to promote ease of access and monitoring of compliance with organisational and regulatory requirements by local managers.
  • Continue to review signposting criteria relating to the screening for diabetes and heart health.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

5 September 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 5 September 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Nuffield Health West Byfleet Fitness & Wellbeing Centre is part of Nuffield Health, a not-for-profit healthcare provider. They provide health assessments that include a range of screening processes. Following an assessment and screening process patients undergo a consultation with a doctor to discuss the findings of the results and any recommended lifestyle changes or treatment planning. The health assessment clinic is based within the fitness centre. In addition to the GP, there is a general manager, a clinic manager (who is also a physiologist), two physiotherapists and two physiology staff supporting the health assessment service. Patients seen in the clinic are either private patients or employees of organisations who are provided with health and wellbeing services as part of their employee benefit package. The services are provided to adults only and are not commissioned by the NHS.

The general manager is also the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. For example, physiotherapy and lifestyle coaching do not fall within the regulated activities for which the location is registered with CQC.

We obtained eight completed Care Quality Commission comment cards. Feedback was very positive about the service provided and the professionalism and friendliness of the staff.

Our key findings were:

  • There was a transparent approach to safety with demonstrably effective systems in place for reporting and recording incidents
  • The service was offered on a private, fee paying basis to adults only.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • All health assessment rooms were well organised and equipped.
  • There were systems in place to check all equipment had been serviced regularly, including blood screening equipment.
  • Clinicians regularly assessed patients according to appropriate guidance and standards such as those issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
  • Staff maintained the necessary skills and competence to support the needs of patients.
  • Staff were up to date with current guidelines and were led by a proactive management team.
  • Risks to patients were well managed. For example, there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.
  • Systems were in place to deal with medical emergencies and staff were trained in basic life support.
  • Staff were kind, caring, competent and put patients at their ease.
  • Patients were provided with information about their health and with advice and guidance to support them to live healthier lives.
  • The provider was aware of, and complied with, the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

7 January 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This was a follow up visit to check that the provider had achieved compliance with records following our previous inspection in July 2013. During this inspection we looked at this one non-compliant outcome. We spoke with staff but did not have an opportunity to speak with people who used the service on the day.

We found the arrangements in place for keeping people's confidential records was more robust and people's records were kept securely.

31 July 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit we did not speak with any of the people visiting the Fitness and Wellbeing Centre. However following our inspection we contacted four people who had used the service on the day of our visit. People told us they had been given enough information about their treatments.

People told us staff were good at discussing issues and concerns with them during their assessments. They told us treatment and discussions were provided in private in consulting rooms.

There were arrangements in place to ensure people were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. Infection prevention measures were in place and the clinic was clean and hygienic. One person said "it's spotless".

People were cared for, or supported by, suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff. People were made aware of the complaints procedures.

People's confidential information was not kept securely.