• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Lisle Court Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Brunswick Street, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV31 2ES (01926) 425436

Provided and run by:
Lisle Court Medical Centre

All Inspections

21 September 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We previously carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Lisle Court Medical Centre on 14 July 2016. As a result of our inspection the practice was rated as requires improvement in safe, caring and well-led with good in effective and responsive; with an overall rating for the practice of requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the April 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Lisle Court Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection carried out on 21 September 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to address the areas requiring improvement that we identified in our inspection in July 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to the requirements and improvements made since our last inspection.

We found the practice had carried out a detailed analysis of the previous inspection findings and taken action to address areas where improvements were needed. The practice had made extensive changes which had resulted in significant improvements. Practice staff had taken responsibility for embedding and maintaining these improvements themselves and we saw a positive approach to performance and improvement throughout.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff knew how to document significant events and escalate concerns. There was a system for dealing with incidents and learning was shared with staff at team meetings. Records showed that changes implemented when lessons were learned were kept under regular review to ensure that these had been fully embedded.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. The system for recording and monitoring GP training had been improved and showed that training in infection control and fire safety was up to date.
  • Data showed patient outcomes were rated in line with the local and national averages. A programme of continuous audit evidenced improvement to patient outcomes.
  • Although the National GP Patient Survey results published in July 2017 showed that overall patients’ experience of the practice and the satisfaction scores were lower than local and national averages, there had been improvements in some areas.
  • The practice had a diverse population with a large number of Punjabi speaking patients. An interpreter was employed to accommodate this group and conducted approximately one third of consultations in languages other than English.
  • Policies were specific to the practice and easily accessible to all staff.
  • The management of medicines and emergency equipment had been improved with revised procedures which were regularly monitored to ensure they were followed.
  • The process for updating Patient Group Directions (PGDs) had been revised and ensured that PDGs were signed before they were acted upon.
  • The practice monitored and encouraged uptake of childhood immunisations to improve health outcomes. Unpublished data showed results had increased and were now in line with local and national averages.
  • The practice encouraged its patients to attend national screening programmes for bowel and breast cancer screening, but uptake for both was lower than local and national averages. Staff followed an established recall protocol to encourage patients to take up screening opportunities.

There were some areas where improvements should be made:

  • Continue to encourage patients to engage in screening programmes.
  • Take action to improve patient satisfaction particularly in the area of GP/patient interaction.

The practice is now rated as good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive services, and for being well-led. The overall rating for the practice is now good.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

14/07/2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Lisle Court Medical Centre on 12 July 2016. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff knew how to document significant events and escalate concerns. There was a system in place for dealing with incidents and a log was maintained and reviewed to help ensure these were resolved. The practice did not record evidence that changes had been implemented when lessons were learned from significant events.
  • Some risks to patients were assessed and well managed. Those relating to GPs training needed more effective systems were required to ensure training in infection control and fire safety was up to date.
  • Data showed patient outcomes were low compared to the national average. A programme of continuous audit evidenced improvement to patient outcomes.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed that although the majority of patients were satisfied with the care they received from the practice, satisfaction scores were lower than local and national averages.
  • The practice had a diverse population with a large number of Punjabi speaking patients. The practice employed an interpreter to accommodate this group and conducted approximately one third of consultations in languages other than English.
  • The policies in operation were specific to the practice and easily accessible to all staff.
  • There were some measures in place to identify risks but steps taken to mitigate these did not adequately protect staff and patients.
  • One of the medicines kept in cold storage was out of date, as were children and adults masks in the practice’s resuscitation bag.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Take action to improve the management of medicines and emergency equipment.
  • Improve the process for updating Patient Group Directions (PGDs) to ensure these are signed before they are acted upon.

In addition the provider should:

  • GPs should receive up to date training in infection control and fire safety.
  • Improve the process for managing significant events to ensure that changes are implemented when lessons are learned from significant events.
  • Implement measures to encourage patient uptake of breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening to improve health outcomes.
  • Continue to monitor and encourage patient uptake of childhood immunisations to improve health outcomes.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

22 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five patients who identified satisfaction with the care and treatment received at the practice. Two people told us that they attended the patient forum group which was linked to the practice. One patient told us, 'Patients feedback and they listen. There have been positive changes. A disabled toilet has been installed, large print information is available and a sign has been put in reception advising the patient that confidential discussions can take place in a separate room'.

We spoke with four staff, the provider and five community health professionals who had worked in collaboration with the practice. The community teams we spoke with identified that good working relationships existed between themselves and the practice. We found that patients had been cared for by staff who were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard.

We found effective communication and referral pathways existed between the practice and other healthcare professionals. Patients told us that their GP had supported them throughout the referral process. We saw that patients had been involved in making decisions about their care and treatment.

Systems and guidance were in place to protect vulnerable adults and children. Staff were able to identify what constituted a safeguarding event and what to do should a safeguarding event take place.

We saw effective systems in place to assess and monitor complaints at the practice.