• Doctor
  • GP practice

Plas Meddyg Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

40 Parkhill Road, Bexley, Kent, DA5 1HU (01322) 470595

Provided and run by:
Plas Meddyg Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Plas Meddyg Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Plas Meddyg Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

10 September 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Plas Meddyg Surgery on 10 September 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

6 April 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of the practice on 11 August 2015. Breaches of legal requirements were found. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach of regulation 12(1)(2)(b)(d)(g)(h) Safe care and treatment of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

We undertook this desk-based focussed inspection on 6 April 2016 to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met the legal requirements. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also where additional improvements have been made following the initial inspection. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Plas Meddyg Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Overall the practice is rated as Good. Specifically, following the focussed inspection we found the practice to be good for providing safe services. As the practice was now found to be providing good services for safety, this affected the ratings for the population groups we inspect against. Therefore, it was also good for providing services for older people; people with long-term conditions; families, children and young people; working age people (including those recently retired and students); people whose circumstances make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia).

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Risks to patients were assessed and well-managed, including those related to medicines management, infection control and responding to emergencies.

However there was an area of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Ensure that there are systems in place to monitor actions taken as a result of learning and improvements from incidents and ensure that learning from significant events and incidents is clearly disseminated amongst staff.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

11 August 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Plas Meddyg Surgery on 11 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the CQC at that time.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, which were reviewed annually. The practice held regular governance meetings where issues were discussed.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • Some risks to patients were assessed and well managed, with the exception of those relating to medicines management, recruitment checks and responding to emergencies. Action points were not always monitored effectively to demonstrate that improvements in the practice had been successful.
  • Data showed patient outcomes were average or above for the locality. Although some audits had been carried out with improvement in patient outcomes, they did not all demonstrate that any improvements had been monitored.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider must:

  • Ensure that the practice has systems in place to be able to appropriately respond to emergencies, including access to a defibrillator.
  • Ensure appropriate medicines management procedures are followed to include adequate monitoring of emergency medicines, oxygen, nitrous oxide and vaccine refrigerator temperatures.
  • Ensure there are adequate infection control processes in place to include formalised infection control training for staff and an up to date legionella risk assessment.

In addition the provider should:

  • Ensure adequate recruitment checks are carried out including criminal records checking prior to commencing employment and that comprehensive records of recruitment checks are kept.
  • Ensure staff attend the scheduled child protection training so they are trained to the appropriate level.
  • Ensure that there are systems in place to monitor actions taken as a result of learning and improvements from incidents and complaints, to demonstrate that changes in the practice have been successful.
  • Ensure that all clinical audits undertaken show completed audit cycles to demonstrate that improvements to patient outcomes have been maintained.
  • Ensure that multidisciplinary and clinical meetings are documented to demonstrate learning points, actions taken and changes to patient outcomes.
  • Ensure access to services has been considered for patients with language barriers.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice