- Homecare service
Everyday Recruitment Agency
Assessment report published 29 May 2026
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Learning culture
- Safe systems, pathways and transitions
- Safeguarding
- Involving people to manage risks
- Safe environments
- Safe and effective staffing
- Infection prevention and control
- Medicines optimisation
Safe
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.
At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
Learning culture
The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Staff listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice.
Staff were trained and skilled to provide safe care. Regular handovers and staff meetings ensured knowledge and experiences were shared. Staff understood how to raise safety incidents. A staff member said, “We use an application an [electronic system], where we can recall everything. We call the office if we need advice or support and the office will take forward any actions.” The provider evidenced learning from incidents. The registered manager spoke of how an incident with their sister agency prompted a review of procedures and refresher training as an organisation, to reduce the risk of a similar incident reoccurring to ensure people’s safety.
Safe systems, pathways and transitions
The provider worked with people and healthcare partners to establish and maintain safe systems of care, in which safety was managed or monitored. They made sure there was continuity of care, including when people moved between different services.
The registered manager explained how the service worked with healthcare professionals to ensure safe and effective care. A professional said, “My experience of ERA is that information is shared with the staff team and carers within the team. I have met with carers and customers for reviews or information gathering and the carers are knowledgeable and competent with the support that the customer has needed.” Records showed the service had good working relationships with health and social care professionals. This included GP’s, care agencies and district nurses to ensure that information was available when moving between services to ensure a smooth transition process.
Safeguarding
The provider worked with people and healthcare partners to understand what being safe meant to them and the best way to achieve that. Staff concentrated on improving people’s lives while protecting their right to live in safety, free from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm and neglect. The provider shared concerns quickly and appropriately.
The registered manager ensured any safety concerns were raised with the local authority safeguarding team and the CQC. The registered manager gave examples of how the provider had protected people from abuse, including supporting a person to visit the bank to protect them from financial abuse. The provider had safeguarding and whistleblowing policies in place, and the service had regular safeguarding training. Staff spoke confidently of feeling able to raise any concerns with management. A staff member said, “I have no concerns with the service, the manager and office are 10/10, any issues I just call, and they would support me 100%. If an extra carer is needed, they will come out and support.”
Involving people to manage risks
The provider worked with people to understand and manage risks by thinking holistically. Staff provided care to meet people’s needs that was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things that mattered to them.
People were encouraged to remain active and continue to live their lives in the way they chose. Risk assessments were in place in accordance with people’s needs and goals. The registered manager explained how they would promote people’s independence whilst keeping people safe. People expressed that they felt safe and supported with care staff to manage their own risk. A person told us when managing their own risk, “If I have an accident, I call the office and they instantly arrange for a one-off call to come and support me.” The provider had consistent carers who have worked for the service for a long time, enabling the service to promote continuity of care. The service was able to know people’s risks and abilities and promoted independence.
Safe environments
The provider detected and controlled potential risks in the care environment. They made sure equipment, facilities and technology supported the delivery of safe care.
Staff told us that they felt safe completing their role. People told us that staff respected their environment. People’s homes were risk assessed and staff were aware of potential environmental risks. The registered manager told us that they ensured environmental assessments were completed including equipment checks and that the environment was safe from trip hazards. People told us that staff treated their home and property with respect and took care of any equipment they used to support them. Feedback from people did not raise any concerns about cleanliness and people spoke positively of the support staff provided.
Safe and effective staffing
The provider made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. They worked together well to provide safe care that met people’s individual needs.
People were supported by enough staff to meet their needs. People told us that staff attended their calls as planned and if there were issues, they were told. The provider gave a 15-minute window each side of the allotted call time and an audit confirmed that the service was adhering to this. Staff received regular spot checks and supervisions to assess their knowledge and ensure their practice was maintained to a good standard. Training was up to date, with both online and practical sessions. The provider had a training room in the office which was used regularly for refresher training. A staff member said, “I like the job, I like the management and I am not planning on leaving anytime soon, I am happy with the work and the continuity of care.”
Recruitment records showed staff were recruited safely. This included appropriate checks being made before staff started, for example, Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks and previous employment references. Where a staff member had remained employed by the service for some time, DBS checks were renewed.
Infection prevention and control
The provider assessed and managed the risk of infection. They detected and controlled the risk of it spreading and shared concerns with appropriate agencies promptly.
Staff had undertaken training in infection prevention and control. People told us that staff wore personal protective equipment appropriately, and there was guidance in the care plans of when this was needed. Regular spot checks were also completed by management to ensure compliance with this. There were policies and procedures in place and staff demonstrated good knowledge of these. People reported no concerns with staff and felt safe with their carers.
Medicines optimisation
The provider made sure that medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences. Staff involved people in planning, including when changes happened.
People were happy with the way staff supported them with medicines. One person told us, “They are very good, I always have my medication when I need it.” Staff understood how to manage people’s medications safely. They had appropriate training and were regularly observed to ensure their practice remained safe. The provider had an up-to-date policy in place with clear guidance for staff. The registered manager spoke clearly of how they managed medication queries and the use of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, including knowledge of controlled and time specific medications.
Electronic medicine administration records were accurately completed via an electronic application. These were inputted into the system by carers, clearly and were easy to read. Medication audits were completed by the registered manager and refresher training were completed on a regular basis to reduce the risk of medication errors.