• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Coggeshall Surgery

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Stoneham Street, Coggeshall, Colchester, Essex, CO6 1UH (01376) 561242

Provided and run by:
The Coggeshall Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Coggeshall Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Coggeshall Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us including information provided by the practice. Our review indicated that there may have been a significant change to the quality of care provided since the last inspection.

This inspection focused on the following key questions:

Are services at this location safe?

Are services at this location effective?

Are services at this location caring?

Are services at this location responsive?

Are services at this location well-led?

At the last inspection in August 2015 we rated the practice as good overall for services.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected.
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services.
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as outstanding overall.

We rated the practice as outstanding for providing effective services because:

  • Patients received a truly holistic approach to assessing, planning and delivering care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff were consistent in supporting people to live healthier lives through a targeted and proactive approach. Every contact with people was used to prevent ill-health and promote health.

We rated the practice as outstanding for providing caring services because:

  • Feedback from patients was consistently positive and was higher than local and national averages.
  • There was a strong person-centred culture.

We rated the practice as outstanding for providing responsive services because:

  • Services were tailored to meet the needs of individual patients. They were delivered in a flexible way that ensured choice and continuity of care.
  • There were innovative approaches to providing integrated person-centred care.
  • The practice had identified areas where there were gaps in provision locally and had taken steps to address them.

We rated the practice as outstanding for providing well-led services because:

  • The culture of the practice and the way it was led and managed drove the delivery and improvement of high-quality, person-centred care.

These outstanding areas applied to all population groups and so we rated all population groups as outstanding.

We also rated the practice as good for providing safe services because:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice including:

  • The practice had a culture that tailored their services to meet the needs of people on an individual basis. They ensured flexibility, and patient centred care telling us, ‘it’s all about the patient’ and involved them in choices and decisions about their care and treatment.
  • Clinical and non-clinical audit had driven their philosophy to monitor and investigate every aspect of the service they delivered. This ranged from service administration, through to patient satisfaction, compliments, comments, and best practice clinical guidance. Audits were run regularly and discussed with management and clinicians to monitor trends.
  • Clinical data has remained consistently high over a number of years, reflective high quality care for their patients. This was achieved through a whole practice approach to managing patients and their health conditions across all population groups.
  • Patients interviewed were able to describe a number of instances where they felt staff members had gone above and beyond their duty of care to support them. This was reflected in the many extremely positive comments seen on the comment cards we left, and the comments on the NHS choices website giving them the highest rating of five stars.
  • Actions, improvements and changes were seen as a continual work ethos to improve and develop the service.
  • Staff we spoke with understood the vision and values promoted by the practice leaders and could describe how they were proud to be involved.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

27 August 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Coggeshall Surgery on 27 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and near misses. All opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were maximised.
  • The practice used innovative and proactive methods to improve patient outcomes, working with other local providers and the community to share best practice.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. Information was provided to help patients understand the care available to them.
  • The practice worked closely with other organisations and with the local community in planning how services were provided to ensure that they met people’s needs.
  • The practice implemented suggestions for improvements and made changes to the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and from the Patient Participation Group (PPG).
  • Clinical performance was consistently high and maintained over a number of years. All staff understood their roles and worked towards achieving their targets and objectives.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. Information about how to complain was available and easy to understand
  • The practice had a clear vision which had quality and safety as its top priority. It was monitored and regularly reviewed and discussed with all staff.
  • There were high levels of staff satisfaction and all staff worked as part of a cohesive unit. High standards were promoted and owned by all practice staff with evidence of team working across all roles.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice