• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Grange Group Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Fartown Grange, Spaines Road, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD2 2QA (01484) 428282

Provided and run by:
The Grange Group Practice

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Grange Group Practice on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Grange Group Practice, you can give feedback on this service.

4 and 5 May 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Grange Group Practice on 4 and 5 May 2022. Following this inspection, we rated the location as good overall, and for all key questions.

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Good

The practice was previously inspected on 19 August 2015 and rated as good overall and for all key questions.

The full report for our previous inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Grange Group Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection. We undertook this inspection at the same time as CQC inspected a range of urgent and emergency care services in West Yorkshire. To understand the experience of GP Providers and people who use GP services, we asked a range of questions in relation to urgent and emergency care. The responses we received have been used to inform and support system wide feedback.

The comprehensive inspection included additional questions in relation to urgent and emergency care.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included

  • Conducting some staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A shorter site visit
  • Staff questionnaires

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall

We found that:

  • There were systems in place to safeguard children and vulnerable adults from abuse and staff we spoke with knew how to identify and report safeguarding concerns.
  • Leaders reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care the service provided. They ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • There was a programme of quality improvement, including clinical audit.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care.
  • Staff involved and treated people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • The practice operated effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Leaders demonstrated they had the capacity and skills to deliver high-quality, sustainable care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue to monitor and make improvements to increase the uptake of cervical screening.
  • Continue to monitor and make improvements to increase childhood immunisation uptake.
  • Continue to monitor and review patient experience outcomes for responsive services.

The evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

19 August 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Grange Group Practice on 19 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, including those relating to recruitment checks.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Urgent appointments were available on the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and met their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

We saw an area of outstanding practice:

  • The One Stop Diabetic Clinic review demonstrated success in reducing the need for secondary care for patients living with diabetes whilst also achieving high satisfaction rate with the patients. This service resulted in the prevalence of registered patients with diabetes rise from 3.5% in 2009 to 6.2% in 2014 as patients were registering with this practice from other local practices. Patient satisfaction rates averaged 8.5 out of 10 for convenience, ease and usefulness.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice