• Doctor
  • GP practice

Cheddar Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Roynon Way, Cheddar, Somerset, BS27 3NZ (01934) 742061

Provided and run by:
Cheddar Medical Centre

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 16 June 2026. Cheddar Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 8,500 people under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 97% White, 1% Asian, 1% Mixed, 1% Black and Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure people were kept safe. However, the service did not manage fire safety risks consistently. The service assessed the risk of infection and had processes in place to control the risk of it spreading. However, these processes were not always effective in the management of water safety; sharps bins for disposal of used needles; carpet cleaning; and evidence of staff vaccinations. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. However, the service had not completed all the required pre-employment checks when recruiting staff.

Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes.

Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity.

People could access care, treatment and support when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers.

The service had a vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community.

Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through governance processes. However, these processes were not always effective or consistently followed. There was no oversight to ensure delegated tasks had been completed and risks had not always been identified and addressed.

We identified a breach of regulations relating to good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

04/10/2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced focussed inspection at Cheddar Medical Practice on 4 October 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We decided to undertake an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us. This inspection looked at whether the practice provided effective and well led services.

The practice was previously inspected in June 2015 and in the report published in July 2015 we reported the practice to be good overall and good in providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services. We found no areas for concern.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good for providing effective and well led services because:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm
  • People had good outcomes because they received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Information about people’s care and treatment was routinely collected, monitored and acted upon.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
  • Clinical and internal audit processes functioned well and had a positive impact in relation to quality governance.

We rated all population groups as good.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

2 June 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Cheddar Medical Practice on 2 June 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, well led, effective, caring and responsive services. It was also rated as good for providing services for all of the population groups.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The practice used innovative and proactive methods to improve patient outcomes, working with other local providers to share best practice.
  • The practice implemented suggestions for improvements and made changes to the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and from the Patient Participation Group (PPG).
  • The practice facilities were designed and equipped to meet patients’ treatment needs.
  • Information about how to complain was available and easy to understand.

We saw areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice is part of the North Sedgemoor Federation of GP practices in Somerset who use the Somerset Village Agent project . The project uses paid, part time, highly trained individuals living in the parish ‘clusters’ they support. They help to bridge the gap between socially isolated, excluded, vulnerable and lonely individuals and statutory and/or voluntary organisations which offer specific solutions to identified needs. The North Sedgemoor Federation also funds the Singing for the Brain service for people living with dementia, which was initiated in 2014 and is funded until 2016, and provided by the Alzheimer’s Society.
  • We found one GP had been nominated as an “NHS hero” which is a new scheme to recognise the work that individuals and teams do every day in the NHS. They are the only GP in Somerset to have received this award.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice