• Doctor
  • GP practice

Woolstone Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Woolstone Road, London, SE23 2SG (020) 8699 1062

Provided and run by:
Woolstone Medical Centre

All Inspections

12 October 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at Woolstone Medical Centre between 10 and 12 October 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

Safe-Requires Improvment.

Effective - Good.

Caring - Good

Responsive – Good.

Well-led - Good.

Following our previous inspection on 4 August 2016, the practice was rated Good overall and for all key questions and rated outstanding for responsive care.

The full report for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for at Woolstone Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection part of a random selection of services rated Good and Outstanding to test the reliability of our new monitoring approach which involved a site visit: We looked at the Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led key questions.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • What we found when we inspected.
  • Information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services.
  • Information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall

We found that:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

We found breaches of regulation. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to take action to improve childhood immunisation and cervical screening uptake.
  • Continue to work on establishing a Patient Participation Group.
  • Undertake a patient survey.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

4 August 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Woolstone Medical Centre on 4 August 2016 and 1 September 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. However, fire extinguishers at the practice had not been serviced.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. However, the practice did not keep a centralised record that all relevant training had been completed.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

We saw the following areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had received feedback from patients with poor mental health and learning disabilities that they felt that a patient waiting room could feel congested and leave them feeling nervous. As a result the practice had :

  • Designed and introduced a quiet room adjacent to the wating room next to the reception area. This allowed patients to wait in a quiet and secluded area. The practice staff had received training from the Rethink mental health charity, and they had used this training when designing the room.

  • Across the road from the practice was a care home for patients with complex learning disabilities. As well as the quiet room, the practice had put in place a system whereby patients could be called from by the doctor directly from the home, preventing them from having to wait for their appointment. The practice had received positive feedback from patients with poor mental health, vulnerable patients and carers in relation to these changes.

  • The practice provided details of specific training with which staff had been provided to better provide services to patients, including autism and dementia awareness.

  • One member of the reception team had been trained in grief counselling and was a point of contact for these patients.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • The practice should arrange for fire extinguishers in the practice to be serviced on an annual basis.

  • The practice should consider keeping a local record of all relevant training completed by staff in the practice.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice