• Doctor
  • GP practice

Buckland Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Buckland Medical Centre,, Brookfield Place, Buckland Avenue,, Dover, Kent, CT16 2AE (01304) 206353

Provided and run by:
Buckland Medical Practice

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Buckland Medical Practice on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Buckland Medical Practice, you can give feedback on this service.

During an assessment under our new approach

The practice was last inspected 11 June 2019 and rated good. We carried out an announced assessment of one quality statement, Equity of Access, under the key question Responsive at Buckland Medical Practice on the 18 January 2024. Responsive assessments are remote focused reviews to help us understand what practices are doing to try to meet patient demand and the current experience of people who use these services and of providers. The responsive key question is still rated as good. The service remains rated as good overall. We recognise the commitment and often innovative work that GP practices have been engaged in to continue to provide safe, quality care to the people they serve. We know colleagues are doing this while demand for general practice remains exceptionally high, with more appointments being provided than ever. In this challenging context, access to general practice remains a concern for people. These assessments of the quality statement Equity in Access in the responsive key question includes looking at what practices are doing innovatively to improve patient access to primary care and sharing this information to drive improvement. People can access services when they need to, without physical or digital barriers, including out of normal hours and in an emergency. People are given support to overcome barriers to ensure equal access. The practice understood the challenges to patient access and responded to patient needs.

22/05/2018

During a routine inspection

As part of our inspection process we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Requires improvement

People with long-term conditions – Requires improvement

Families, children and young people – Requires improvement

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Requires improvement

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Requires improvement

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Requires improvement

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Buckland Medical Practice on 22 May 2018.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice did not have clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen.
  • The practice did not routinely review the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons are deployed to meet the fundamental standards of care and treatment.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out the duties.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review and improve the system for complaints to help ensure trends are being identified and actioned and that these are escalated as significant events or near misses when appropriate. This should include reviewing complaints from other forums. For example, NHS choices.
  • Review and improve the system for identifying and supporting carers to help ensure their needs are being met.

I am placing this service in special measures. Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. If insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of inadequate for any population group, key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve.

The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.

Special measures will give people who use the service the reassurance that the care they get should improve.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

1 December 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Buckland Medical Practice, also known as Buckland Medical Centre on 1 December 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. The staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Most patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients and formulated action plans with their patient participation group.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Review the soundproofing of rooms within the practice to help ensure that patient’s confidentiality and privacy are maintained. Review systems so that monthly checks such as those on emergency medicines or infection control are completed during times of unplanned staff absence.

  • Promote the availability of extended hours at the nearby Peter Street Surgery and the Hub in Dover.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice