• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Heron Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

John Scott Health Centre, Green Lanes, London, N4 2NU (020) 3994 6901

Provided and run by:
The Heron Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 28 July and 30 July 2026. The Heron Practice is a GP practice and delivers services to 12397 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that the practice ethnicity estimate is 56.2% White, 9.8% Asian, 16.9% Black, 7.2% Mixed, 9.9% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the third decile (3 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

We undertook this assessment due to the time elapsed since the previous inspection. This was a comprehensive assessment. We assessed 33 quality statements, across five key questions.

The assessment included a remote clinical assessment on 28 July and a site visit on 30 July.

The service has been rated good overall and in each key question.

5 October 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 5 October 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

However, there were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Continue with efforts to recruit more nurses to reduce additional pressure on other members of the clinical team and improve patients’ access to services.
  • Continue to monitor access arrangements for, and the care provided to, patients with learning disabilities to improve outcomes for the patient group.


Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice