• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Brookland House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 6 Yeomanry Road, Battlefield Enterprise Park, Shrewsbury, SY1 3EH (01939) 211774

Provided and run by:
Willow Care North Shropshire Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

The assessment started on 20 October 2025 and ended on 17 December 2025. 2 inspectors carried out a site visit to the agency’s office on 11 and 27 November 2025. We gave the provider 24 hours’ notice of our first visit to ensure they were available to assist with our assessment. The service is a care at home service providing support to people in their own homes who were living with dementia, people with an eating disorder, learning disabilities or autistic spectrum, mental health, older people, younger adults, physical disability and sensory impairment. This assessment was prompted by some concerns we had received relating to alleged missed or late calls and the skills and training of staff. The provider was already aware of these issues and had taken action to address them.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgments about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The provider supported a small number of people with a learning disability, and we found they were supported to live the life they chose in their own homes. Staff had received appropriate training to support people with a learning disability or autism.

The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff were recruited safely. Staff understood and managed risks, including environmental risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Improvements were being made to ensure newly appointed staff had an induction period which met their needs. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it.Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. People with protected characteristics felt supported. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. There were effective systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided.

17 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Brookland House is a domiciliary care agency providing care to people in their own homes in Shropshire. At the time of our inspection 100 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care from the service. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care, which is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

People and their relatives told us they felt safe. Risks associated with people's care and home environments were identified, assessed and well managed. Staff knew how to keep people safe. People received their medicines safely and when needed, by staff trained in medicine management.

The prevention and control of infections were managed in line with government guidance and provider procedures.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The registered manager had systems and processes in place to monitor and review the quality of the service provided, for example, audits of care plans. Staff felt supported by the management team, who worked in an open and transparent way.

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for the service was good, (published 25 September 2019).

Why we inspected

We received concerns in relation to missed calls and unsafe recruitment of staff. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only. We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the safe and well led sections of this full report.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

The overall rating for the service has remained good based on the findings of this inspection.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Brooklands House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Follow Up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

11 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Infil House is a domiciliary care service providing care and support to people in their own homes. They were providing a service to 32 people at the time of the inspection. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider recruited staff safely and ensured that required checks were completed before they started to provide care to people.

People received care from a team of regular care workers. They were deployed to meet people's needs and respond to changes in their need.

The provider had submitted notifications as necessary to the Care Quality Commission. The provider is legally obliged to send us notifications of incidents, events or changes that happen to the service within a required timescale.

People received safe care and support because staff were trained to recognise signs of potential abuse.

Staff followed good hygiene practice when supporting people in their own homes.

People were supported by a caring and kind staff team. People were supported to maintain their independence and their privacy and dignity was valued and respected.

People received safe care and support because risks were assessed and managed to reduce the likelihood of avoidable harm.

Systems used for the management of medicines were safe and people received their medicines as prescribed.

The provider arranged training for staff that met the needs of people using the service. Staff were assessed for their competency which ensured they were safe to work with people.

Care plans were developed for each individual and included people's preferences and wishes.

Audits were in place that checked the quality of the service. Action plans were implemented and followed where necessary. There was an open culture in the service and the registered manager made themselves available to people.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This was the first inspection of this location. The service was rated as good.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the provider being a new legal entity.