• Doctor
  • GP practice

Dr Chandrakant Patel

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Dr CM Patel's Surgery, 2 Jephson Road, London, E7 8LZ (020) 8470 6429

Provided and run by:
Dr CM Patel's Surgery

Assessment report published 27 July 2026

Ratings

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Good

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

Date of Assessment: 4 June 2026. Dr Chandrakant Patel is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 3,200 people under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 17% White, 65% Asian, 3% Mixed, 11% Black and 4% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 3rd decile (3 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure people were kept safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection well and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes. Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity. People could access care, treatment and support when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers. The service had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

People's experience of this service

As part of our assessment, we reviewed feedback from people who used the service to understand their views and experience of the service. This included feedback provided to the service as well as feedback provided to the CQC. People were positive about the quality of their care and treatment. They described how staff treated them with kindness and compassion and respected their privacy. This was mirrored in the results of recent surveys, including the 2025 National GP Patient Survey, which showed most people were satisfied and scores exceeded local and national averages. However, the practice did not have an active patient participation group (PPG) who represented the views of people using the service. The practice informed us they had attempted to form a PPG and will continue to do so but had not been able to do so successfully at the time of the inspection.